JAKARTA - The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) said two witnesses in a corruption case related to the provision of financing facilities from the Indonesian Export Financing Institution (LPEI) did not meet the call on Tuesday, April 14. They did not give information to investigators so that they were considered absent.
The two witnesses who should be examined are Chandra Adiwijaya Hong as the Director/Owner/Responsible of PT Mitra Karya Usaha Sejahtera and Hadi Surya who is the Director/Owner/Responsible of PT Daya Sakti Unggul Corp., Tbk. Both of them should be examined at the KPK Red and White building, Kuningan Persada, South Jakarta.
"Both witnesses were not present. Investigators have not received confirmation from the witnesses," said KPK spokesperson Budi Prasetyo to reporters through his written statement, Wednesday, April 15.
Budi said the second summons for the two would be carried out. "We will coordinate and schedule," he said.
Previously, the KPK had named five people as suspects in a corruption case related to the provision of credit facilities by the Indonesian Export Financing Agency (LPEI).
They are Dwi Wahyudi as the Managing Director of I LPEI; Arif Setiawan as the Managing Director of 4 LPEI; Jimmy Masrin as President Director of PT Caturkarsa Megatunggal and also President Commissioner of PT Petro Energy; Newin Nugroho as President Director of PT Petro Energy and Susy Mira Dewi Sugiarta as Financial Director of PT Petro Energy.
In this case, the anti-corruption commission suspected a conflict of interest (CoI) between the LPEI Director and the Debtor (PT Petro Energy) by making an initial agreement to facilitate the credit granting process. The LPEI Director is suspected of not controlling the truth of the use of credit in accordance with the MAP.
The LPEI director also ordered his subordinates to continue to provide credit even if it was not eligible. Meanwhile, PT Petro Energy is suspected of falsifying purchase order and invoice documents which became the underlying disbursement of facilities that did not match the actual conditions.
Then, PT Petro Energy was also suspected of window dressing the Financial Report (LK). This company was then said to use credit facilities that were not in accordance with the purpose and provisions as stated in the credit agreement with LPEI.
The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)
