Witness Reveals Chronology Of Hit And Run Incident That Killed Elderly At Taman Grisenda Housing

The atmosphere of the trial of the accident case that caused the death toll in the Taman Grisenda Jakut Housing/ Photo: IST

The case of the accident case with the defendant ISA (65) entered the evidentiary agenda by presenting witnesses at the North Jakarta District Court on Thursday, September 4, 2025. The Public Prosecutor (JPU) presented four witnesses who incriminated the defendant in the hit-and-run case, Ivon Setia Anggara (65).

The defendant allegedly hit the victim with the initials S (82) at the Park Grisenda RW 10 Housing, Kapuk Muara Village, Penjaringan District, North Jakarta, Friday, September 9, 2025.

"We present four witnesses, namely the Head of RW, two security officers from the complex and the victim's child who knew about the hit-and-run incident," said Attorney Rakhmat during a witness examination hearing at the North Jakarta District Court (PN).

The four witnesses were the Head of RW Rusdi, two security officers Tarmanto and Imam Syafei and the child of the victim Haposan.

"Meanwhile, witnesses who saw the Do Tjui accident were still unable to attend this trial," he said.

During the trial, witness Rusdi said he knew about the incident after being contacted by witness So Tjui and he immediately contacted the security officers at the guard post.

"I contacted the officer through 'handy talk (HT)' who saw the car that hit the victim. Then the officer hit and said the car was parked in a shophouse inside the complex," he said.

He admitted that he immediately went to the shophouse and spoke with the defendant to go to the location to see if there were accident victims.

"The defendant said that he hit a driver, didn't hit anyone. After a tough discussion, we finally went to the scene," he said.

After arriving at the location, he asked two security officers to take the victim to the PIK Hospital using the defendant's car.

"I immediately went home and the injured victim was taken to the hospital," he said.

Witness Haposan, the victim's son, admitted that he received information about the accident after being contacted by security officers who asked about a photo of the accident victim at the complex where he lived.

"I saw clothes, pants and shoes similar to my father. I rushed straight to the hospital," he said.

Arriving at the hospital, he saw his father's head wrapped in bandages and still in medical treatment.

"I asked the defendant about the chronology of the incident. He said that his father was suddenly hit," he said.

After that, he returned to the ER room to see the condition of his father and after that he heard the statement from the officer that the defendant admitted that he only hit the sign not someone.

Then a few hours after that came someone to him who claimed to be the defendant's family. He said the costs would be borne by all and this made him angry.

"My father is still lying down, he should have been asked what conditions he could help. This was immediately offered money and there was no apology," he said.

He said the hit-and-run incident was clearly recorded through a surveillance camera (CCTV) at the location. The camera is at three points and one point clearly shows the incident.

"I have seen the recording given by Mr. RW and asked that this recording be stored properly because it is evidence," he said.

The victim with the initials S (82) died after several days of treatment at the ICU at Pantai Indah Kapuk Hospital (PIK) after being hit by the defendant ISA, during a morning exercise at Taman Grisenda Housing, Kapuk Muara Village, Penjaringan District, North Jakarta on Friday, May 9.

The 82-year-old victim underwent routine morning street activities at the housing complex. Then, suddenly a white car came from behind and hit his father.

This incident was recorded by a number of surveillance cameras in the area. The car had stopped and immediately continued the journey.

"He immediately ran away and did not help my papa who was lying covered in blood," he said.

According to him, at the location there were also a number of witnesses who knew about the incident and asked the security officers for help.

After seeing the recording, officers searched for the whereabouts of the perpetrator's car and the car was neatly parked at a shophouse close to the area.

"When asked by the officer, this perpetrator admitted that he only hit the pole and he was convoluted in giving an explanation," he said.

He said that if the defendant wanted to help and was not complicated, his father's life might still be saved.

"My father died after bleeding after three days of treatment," he said.

He said that there had been no good faith from the defendant since the beginning of the deadly accident that occurred to his family.

The prosecutor charged ISA with Article 311 Paragraph (5) of Law Number 22 Year 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation.

The attorney for the victim's family, Madsanih Manong, said that with the evidence by presenting witnesses, according to him, there was no longer any rebuttal because all the fact witnesses presented today would burden the defendant.

"Regarding the detention, the condition for the city's detention is a health problem. We will see evidence with our own eyes, the panel of judges should evaluate it. To detain the detention center, because this is for the sake of justice for the community," he said.