Ronald Tannur Calls Dini Sera Not His Lover But Karaoke Guide

Ronald Tannur At The Jakarta Corruption Court (DOK Rizky AP/VOI)

JAKARTA - The convict Gregorius Ronald Tannur stated that the late Dini Sera Afrianti was not his lover. The relationship with Dini is professional considering that he works as a song singer or LC.

Ronald made this statement while testifying in the trial of alleged bribery and gratification with the three inactive judges of the Surabaya District Court, namely Erintuah Damanik, Mangapul and Heru Hanindyo.

"The victim is a karaoke guide or what we usually call Ladies Companion or LC," said Ronald Tannur during a trial at the Jakarta Corruption Court, Tuesday, February 25.

In fact, in the trial Ronald Tannur mentioned several times using the services of Dini Sera Afrianti as a karaoke guide. This is what their relationship is getting closer.

"So the victim had several photos of me and then posted it by the media and made me the victim's girlfriend," he said.

Hearing this testimony, the defendant's legal adviser Heru again asked questions to confirm or clarify Ronald Tannur's relationship with Dini Sera Afrianti.

"So the relationship is actually not a boyfriend or?" asked the defendant's legal adviser Heru.

"My relationship is a close and professional friend but not a boyfriend," said Ronald Tannur.

For information, Ronald Tannur is a convict in the murder case of Dini Sera Afrianti who was sentenced to 5 years in prison by the Supreme Court (MA) in an cassation decision.

Meanwhile, the three inactive judges of the Surabaya District Court were charged with accepting bribes in the form of gifts or promises of Rp4.67 billion and gratuities in the case of alleged bribery and gratuities for granting acquittal to the convicted murder of Ronald Tannur in 2024.

In addition to bribes, the three are also suspected of receiving gratuities in the form of rupiah and various foreign currencies, namely Singapore dollars, Malaysian ringgit, Japanese yen, euro, and Saudi riyals.

Thus, the actions of the defendants are regulated and subject to criminal penalties in Article 12 letter c or Article 6 Paragraph (2) or Article 5 Paragraph (2) and Article 12 B in conjunction with Article 18 of Law (UU) Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 jo. Article 55 Paragraph (1) of the 1st Criminal Code.

In detail, the bribes allegedly received by the three judges included Rp1 billion and 308 thousand Singapore dollars or Rp3.67 billion (exchange rate of Rp11,900).