Attorney General ST Burhanuddin was asked to evaluate the performance of the Deputy Attorney General for Special Crimes (Jampidsus) Febrie Ardiansyah regarding the preparation of the indictment file for the defendant Zarof Ricar.
In the indictment of the former Supreme Court (MA) official, the prosecutor only included Ronald Tannur's case, but did not include other cases, such as the Sugar Group case worth Rp200 billion.
A criminal law expert from Bung Karno University (UBK), Hudi Yusuf, suspects that the prosecutor's inaccuracy was carried out in drafting Zarof's indictment.
"It is impossible for them not to be able to prepare the indictment carefully. If the indictment has many weaknesses or is not careful, what is wrong with the prosecutor?" Hudi told reporters Friday, February 21.
The occurrence of this inaccuracy, Febri Ardiansyah, is said to have to be responsible as a leader. In addition, Attorney General ST Burhanuddin is advised to examine it in order to resolve increasingly wild issues.
"So return to JA, are you willing to check Jampidsus? If there is a mistake or a criminal incident, don't let it go. If it is allowed, you can also ask the person concerned, why? Involved or not involved?" said Hudi.
Meanwhile, observer Director of Political and Public Policy Studies (P3S) Jerry Massie is also suspicious of handling the Zarof Ricar case. Therefore, settlement steps must be taken immediately.
"Because, in the indictment, it is suspected that the prosecutor deliberately did not explain the origin of the source of the bribe amounting to Rp920 billion," said Jerry.
Previously, the Head of the Attorney General's Office, Harli Siregar, denied that there was 'flirting' in making charges for the defendant Zarof Ricar.
"Well, the trial is still ongoing and that is indeed the mechanism. So don't make it up," said Harli.
Denials also appear for prosecutors' charges that are considered weak, as stated by Zarof's attorney.
"The prosecutor's indictment has been prepared according to the procedural law, which is careful, clear, and complete, and meets the formal and material requirements as required in Article 143 of the Criminal Procedure Code," said Harli.
Harli added that Zarof's attorney's statement would be denied in a follow-up trial with the prosecutor's response agenda to the defendant's exception.
"After the exception, the Public Prosecutor will present his opinion regarding the arguments proposed by the defendant in the exception," he said.
For information, it was known that the Sugar Group case was also conditioned by Zarof when Jampidsus investigators at the AGO ransacked his house, in the number Jl. Senayan No. 8, Kel. West Rawa, Kebayoran Baru, South Jakarta.
During the search, written recorded evidence was found regarding the Ronal Tannur case, information circulating was also found written evidence of 'The Sugar Group case is Rp. 200 billion'.
Zarof is said to have admitted that one of the sources of bribes came from a civil dispute between Gunawan Yusuf (GY) et al's Sugar Group Company (SGC), against Marubeni Corporation (MC) et al.
It is reasonable to suspect that the Rp200 billion bribe was related to the Cassation Decision Number 1697 K/Pdt/2015 dated December 14, 2015 in conjunction with the I-PK Number 818 PK/Pdt/2018 dated December 2, 2019 in conjunction with the II PK Number 887 PK/Pdt/2022 dated October 19, 2023, which is a follow-up legal effort classified as idem nebis, namely decisions Number 373/Pdt.G/2010/PN.Jkt.Pst dated March 1, 2012 in conjunction with PT DKI Jakarta Number 75/Pdt/2013/PT.DKI dated April 22, 2013.
The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)
