Chief Judge Of Cassation Value Ronald Tannur Should Be Free, AGO Assessments Soesilo's Examination

Head of the Legal Information Center (Kapuspenkum) AGO Harli Siregar (ANTARA/Nadia Putri Rahmani)

JAKARTA - The Attorney General's Office (AGO) responded to a dissenting opinion from Supreme Court Justice Soesilo in the decision on the cassation level of the alleged murder case that ensnared Ronald Tannur.

"I think this information is valuable information. We want to state, of course each judge has their own belief in assessing a case," said Head of the Legal Information Center (Kapuspenkum) at the AGO Harli Siregar, reported by ANTARA, Wednesday, December 11.

Regarding whether Soesilo will be questioned by investigators, he said the decision depends on the level of urgency in investigating the alleged corruption case in the form of bribery in the cassation-level decision of Ronald Tannur who ensnared former Supreme Court (MA) official Zarof Ricar and Ronald's lawyer, Lisa Rahmat.

"I think it is a concern and of course we will inform investigators. Do investigators consider this very urgent information to be investigated? I think we'll wait," he said.

It is known that the chairman of the assembly who handled the case of Gregorius Ronald Tannur at the cassation level, Supreme Court Judge Soesilo, had different opinions from other Supreme Court judges because he considered that the defendant in the murder of Dini Sera Afrianti should have been acquitted, according to the decision of the Surabaya District Court (PN).

Based on a copy of the cassation decision No. 1466 K/Pid/2024, Soesilo concluded that Ronald Tannur did not have a minister's intention to commit a criminal act.

Therefore, he considered that the decision of the Surabaya District Court to release Ronald Tannur was correct.

"The facts constructed in the indictment of the public prosecutor are connected to evidence, so there is a conclusion or conclusion that the defendant does not have a rea minister to commit a criminal act as indicted by the public prosecutor so that the verdict of the judex facti (PN Surabaya) that releases the defendant from the indictment of the public prosecutor is correct," said Soesilo.

In Soesilo's assessment, the victim Dini Sera Afrianti died from a major tear wound to the liver due to blunt violence that resulted in bleeding.

Although there was a post-mortem that explained the death, Soesilo assessed that the results of the post-mortem did not necessarily state Ronald Tannur as the perpetrator.

"Moreover, until there was an allegation that the defendant ran over Dini Sera Afrianti's body as the cause of the death of Dini Sera Afrianti because there was no evidence that could prove the allegation," continued Soesilo.

Soesilo believes that the witnesses examined at the trial cannot explain the actions charged to Ronald Tannur.

Electronic evidence in the form of CCTV footage also does not show Ronald Tannur having run over Dini Afrianti's body with her car.