Ogah Bepolemic About Dozens Of Sandra Dewi's Bags In The Harvey Moeis Case, AGO: Trial Opens Facts

Sandra Dewi/ANTARA PHOTO/Galih Pradipta/YU.

JAKARTA - The Attorney General's Office (AGO) is reluctant to polemic about Sandra Dewi's rebuttal regarding the origins of dozens of branded bags which were used as evidence in the alleged corruption case of tin commodity trading in the mining permit area (IUP) of PT Timah Tbk 2015-2022 which ensnared her husband, Harvey Moeis. The Head of the Attorney General's Office, Harli Siregar, emphasized that the confiscation that had been carried out must have something to do with the alleged crime. "Yes, go ahead (floating), in my opinion, there is no need to polemic," said Harli to VOI, Tuesday, July 23. According to him, the investigation process carried out by the investigative team was solely to find the truth according to the applicable regulations. So, if there are parties who object, then the trial process becomes a space to prove the claims currently being made. "The criminal law enforcement process is to find material truth and there is a space for proof there, so the trial will certainly reveal all the facts," said Harli. Previously, Harvey Moeis' attorney, Harris Arthur Hedar, said that Sandra Dewi was disappointed that her branded bag was also confiscated by investigators. It said the dozens of bags were bought by the wife of his client using hard work money while in the entertainment world. "That's the result obtained from the sweat of Mrs. SD (Sandra Dewi) which has been clarified by investigators," said Harris.

Meanwhile, in the second phase of the delegation of the suspect Harvey Moeis, several pieces of evidence were also submitted to the South Jakarta District Attorney, such as 88 branded bags.