Former Head Of Lombok Hajj Dormitory Proven Corruption, Sentenced To Pay Replacement Money Of IDR 484 Million

Former Head of the Technical Service Unit (UPT) of the Lombok Embarkation Hajj Dormitory Abdurrazak Al Fakhir was convicted of a corruption case (ANTARA)

MATARAM - Former Head of the Technical Service Unit (UPT) of the Lombok Embarkation Hajj Dormitory Abdurrazak Al Fakhir was declared the judge was proven to have been proven corrupt in 2019 Non-Tax State Revenue (PNBP) funds.

Abdurrazak was sentenced to one year and two months in prison with a fine of IDR 50 million, a subsidiary of two months in prison.

"In the management of PNBP funds, the defendant allowed and even ordered the use of the money for the benefit of himself and others," said Chief Justice Prasetyo at Abdurrazak's trial at the Mataram Corruption Eradication Court, quoted by Antara, Wednesday, March 17.

According to the judge, this corruption case caused a loss of Rp484.26 million in state finances. The loss figure is in accordance with the results of the examination by the NTB Representative Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP).

Abdurrazak was also sentenced to indemnify the state in accordance with the results of the BPKP NTB examination of Rp.484.26 million, a subsidiary of six months in prison.

The panel of judges also charged the replacement money with the defendant two, who were the treasurers of the Lombok Embarkation Hajj Dormitory Iffan Jaya Kusuma.

However, with regard to state losses, Abdurrazak is known to have entrusted Rp288.314 million to the public prosecutor. The judge decided that the money was confiscated to be used as compensation for state losses.

For Uffan Jaya Kusuma, the panel of judges sentenced him to a lower sentence than his former superior by imprisoning him for one year and a fine of Rp. 50 million, a subsidiary of two months in prison.

The judge decided that Iffan's deposit of Rp. 123.38 million was confiscated as compensation for state financial losses.

The two defendants were found guilty of violating Article 3 in conjunction with Article 18 of the Corruption Act in conjunction with Article 54 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code.