JAKARTA - The Public Prosecutor (JPU) questioned witness Radite Hermawan as Deputy Head of Detachment C of the National Police Paminal Bureau regarding the correspondence mechanism. The scatter was because the team of prosecutors felt strange about the order (sprin) for the handling of the case of Nopriansyah Yosua Hutabarat alias Brigadier J. "Not about the letter, regarding the habit of working hours of correspondence, we asked. This witness at the Paminal Bureau concerns correspondence, what time does work until?" asked the judge during a trial at the South Jakarta District Court, Thursday, December 1. The reason behind the prosecutor questioning the witness was because the sprin was published on the day Brigadier J died at the Ferdy Sambo Service's house at the Police Complex, Duren Tiga on July 8. "Because the letter was on July 8, while the incident on July 8 in the BAP of the defendant HK was at 5. The working hours at the Paminal Bureau are at what time regarding correspondence," said the prosecutor. "If the letter is written according to the provisions at 7 to 3 o'clock," replied Radite. According to Radite, the correspondence mechanism already has rules. In addition, the operations of the administrative staff ended at 15.00 WIB. "The staff is different from operations. The administrative staff is from 7 to 3 o'clock," he said. "If there is an incoming letter after 3 o'clock, it is rejected?" asked the prosecutor. "No," said Radite. Radite also argued that he could not provide information regarding the correspondence process above operational time. According to him, there are other parts that have this authority. "Can I have a correspondence at night?" asked the prosecutor. "If that's the case, we can't answer that there must be other functions. We've never done correspondence," said Radite. Radite Hermawan is one of six witnesses presented by the Public Prosecutor in obstructing the investigation into the premeditated murder case of Nopriansyah Yosua Hutabarat alias Brigadier J with the defendants Hendra Kurniawan and Agus Nurpatra. In this case, Hendra Kurniawan and Agus Nurpatra were jointly charged with securing evidence in the form of CCTV from the Police Complex security post, Duren Tiga, South Jakarta. Thus, they are suspected of violating Article 49 in conjunction with Article 33 of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions in conjunction with Article 55 Paragraph (1) 1st of the Criminal Code

The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)