Through 3 Witnesses, The KPK Examined The Acceptance Of Money And A Luxury Car In The Bambang Kayun Case.

Head of the KPK News Section Ali Fikri (Photo: Wardhany T/VOI)

The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) is investigating allegations of receiving luxury money and cars in cases of alleged bribery and gratuities that ensnared AKBP Bambang Kayun. The investigation was carried out by examining three witnesses, including former PT Aria Citra Mulia (ACM) Mukaffi Jemi Naratama employees. "Located at the West Kalimantan Regional Police, the investigation team has finished examining witnesses," said Head of the KPK News Section Ali Fikri to reporters, Tuesday, November 29. Apart from Mukaffi, investigators also examined two witnesses. They are two lawyers, namely Masnen and Neshwaty Arsjad. "The three witnesses were present and their knowledge was investigated, among others, related to the alleged receipt of money and luxury vehicles by parties related to this case," said Ali. Ali said investigators would actually examine two other witnesses, namely a housewife named Dewi Ariati and the private sector, Yayanti. It's just that, they were not present. "Rescheduling is done again," he said. In this case, the KPK named AKBP Bambang Kayun as a suspect even though it had not been announced. He is suspected of getting billions of rupiah to the Toyota Alphard car. Meanwhile, AKBP Bambang Kayun filed a pretrial at the South Jakarta District Court. He sued because he did not accept being named a suspect by the KPK. The South Jakarta District Court Case Tracking Information System (SIPP) said the lawsuit was registered number 108/Pid.Pra/2022/PN JKT.SEL. gift or promise while serving as Head of Subdivision of Criminal and Human Rights (HAM) for the Legal Application of the Bureau of Bankum, Police Legal Division from 2013 to 2019. The money came from Emylia Said and Hermansyah. Next, Bambang also asked the pretrial judge to order the anti-corruption commission to withdraw efforts to block all of his accounts. He also admitted that he suffered losses of up to tens of millions of rupiah. "The act of the respondent who determined the applicant as a suspect without a procedure was a juridical defect or against the law which resulted in a loss of Rp. 25 million per month starting from October until he submitted this application," the lawsuit was quoted as saying.