Baiquni's Attorney Called The Prosecutor's Incomplete Prosecution To Disentangle Legal Facts

South Jakarta District Court/ Photo" Jehan/ VOI

JAKARTA The legal advisor team for the defendant Baiquni Wibowo rejected the prosecutor's indictment, and filed an exception at today's trial at the South Jakarta District Court, Wednesday, October 26. The agenda for reading the exception will be read out by Baiquni's attorney, Junaidi Saibih.

In the previous trial, Baiquni was charged with copying CCTV footage of the murder case of Nopriansyah Yosua Hutabarat alias Brigadier J. The role of Kompol Baiquni was contained in the indictment read by the Public Prosecutor (JPU).

As read out in today's trial, Junadi said that the defendant Baiquni as the Head of the Riksa Baggak Ethics Subdivision of the Waprof Bureau of the National Police's Division Propam, had carried out his position and the actions he took were still within the scope of the process of examining state administration.

"The factual action taken is still within the scope of the state administration audit process, for which the Aquo's actions are still in the trial stage at the Administrative Court with number 2/PW/2022/PTUN-JKT. For this reason, the tightening process is being postponed. This factual contradicts the principle of Presumtio Iustae causa. Junaidi said at the South Jakarta District Court, Wednesday, October 26.

READ in the trial, the defendant Baiquni as part of the Divpropam carried out monitoring, supervision and receipt of complaints related to members or civil servants of the National Police who were in the process of handling violations of the law.

Considering that when the defendant Baiquni Wibowo took action, he was still monitoring, supervising and assessing whether there were ethical and/or professional violations in two (2) incidents, namely the incident of shooting each other members of the National Police which resulted in the death of Brigadier Nofriansyah Josua Hutabarat and the alleged harassment of Putri Chandrawati. " he continued.

Baiquni's legal advisory team firmly stated that the indictment of the public prosecutor must be declared null and void because it is incomplete in outlining legal facts.

Regarding the electronic documents that were watched were copies of the CCTV footage and did not elaborate on the fits between the CCTV footage and the original footage in the CCTV DVR, resulting in that the proof of the copy of the recording could not be guaranteed authenticity and integrity because it was never matched with the original footage contained in the CCTV DVR.

Then, Junaedi also emphasized, that the next aquo case examination was carried out without being preceded by the administration test of the government officials of the defendant Baiquni first through the State Administrative Court (PTUN).