Prosecutors Ask The Judge To Reject The Exception Of Inspector General Napoleon Bonaparte, The Reason Has Already Entered The Main Case

Inspector General Napoleon Bonaparte (Photo: Antara)

JAKARTA - Prosecutor Umun (JPU) asked the panel of judges to reject the objection note (exception) submitted by the defendant in the case of alleged bribery for red notice, Inspector General Napoleon Bonaparte. The reason is, all exception material has been included in the subject matter.

"(Requesting the panel of judges) Reject the entire memorandum of objection to the exception by the team of legal advisers for the accused Inspector General Napoleon Bonaparte," said Attorney Junaedi during a trial at the Corruption Court, Central Jakarta, Monday, November 16.

In addition, the allegations made by his party in this case have met the requirements in accordance with Article 143 paragraph 2 letters a and b of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHP). So, Junaedi continued, the panel of judges could continue the trial process and try a quo case.

"To continue examining the case on behalf of the accused Inspector General Napoleon Bonaparte," he said.

The prosecutor charged Inspector General Napoleon Bonaparte with receiving hundreds of thousands of US and Singapore dollars from Joko Tjandra. The money was intended to remove Joko Tjandra's red notice when he was still a fugitive in the case of transfer of collection rights or cessie Bank Bali.

"(Inspector General Napoleon) received a sum of SGD200,000.00 and an amount of USD270,000.00," said the prosecutor during the indictment hearing some time ago.

In the indictment, the prosecutor said that Inspector General Napoleon gave the order to issue a letter addressed to the Directorate General of Immigration. The letter was intended to remove Joko Tjandra's name from the Enhanced Cekal System (ECS) at the Immigration Information System (SIMKIM) of the Directorate General of Immigration.

In the case of alleged bribery for the removal of red notice, investigators named four people as suspects. They act as recipients and givers.

Inspector General Napoleon Bonaparte and Brigadier General Prasetyo Utomo were named as suspects because they were suspected of being the recipients of bribes for the removal of red notice. Meanwhile, Tommy Sumardi and Djoko Tjandra were named as suspects on suspicion of giving bribes.

Meanwhile, Inspector General Napoleon through his attorney Santrawan T. Paparang said that the charges submitted by the prosecutor were case fabrications. This is because there is no evidence that the accused received the money.

"The receipt of 200 thousand Singapore dollars and 270 thousand US dollars for the removal of red notices is a fake case fabrication," said Santrawan.

The evidence referred to was that the receipt for the money received by Inspector General Napoleon, which was owned by Tommy Sumardi, was not listed. In fact, the receipt was used by prosecutors and investigators of the Corruption Crime at the National Police Criminal Investigation Unit in making charges.

"With no record of the use of money on the receipt. So, for the sake of law, this true fact cannot be interpreted differently by the Criminal Investigators of the Criminal Investigation Unit of the National Police and by the Public Prosecutor as if the movement of money was moving towards our client, he was the accused, Inspector General Napoleon Bonaparte, "he explained.

As for the alleged removal of red notice bribery, investigators named four people as suspects. They act as recipients and givers.

Inspector General Napoleon Bonaparte and Brigadier General Prasetyo Utomo were named as suspects because they were suspected of being the recipients of bribes for the removal of red notice. Meanwhile, Tommy Sumardi and Djoko Tjandra were named as suspects on suspicion of giving bribes.