Serious Violation, Nabire Religious Court Judge Disrespectful Fired

Illustration of the trial of the Honorary Council of Judges (MKH) MA and KY. (Between)

NABIRE - The Supreme Court (MA) together with the Judicial Commission (KY) decided to dishonorably dismiss a Judge of the Nabire Religious Court with the initials MIM. Dismissal through the Court of Honor of Judges (MKH).

"The MKH trial was carried out based on the Supreme Court's proposal with allegations of disciplinary violations," said KY Spokesperson Miko Susanto Ginting in a written statement, quoted from Antara, Wednesday, July 13.

Miko said the MKH session with the reported MIM was carried out based on a joint stipulation letter from the Chairman of the Supreme Court and the Chairman of the Judicial Commission Number: 2/MKH/2022 concerning the Establishment of the MKH on behalf of the reported MIM.

"The reported party has proposed severe sanctions in the form of dishonorable dismissal as a judge," said Miko.

After reading the report, examining the judges reported, and listening to the defense of the assistant judges reported from the Indonesian Judges Association, including the witness, namely the wife of the reported party, the MKH decided that MIM was legally and convincingly proven guilty.

"The reported party is proven to have committed a disciplinary violation with a sanction in the form of dishonorable dismissal as a judge," he added.

The composition of the MKH Assembly from the Supreme Court is Edi Riadi as chairman and concurrently member, Busra and Suharto as members respectively. Meanwhile, the representatives from KY are M. Taufiq HZ, Sukma Violetta, Siti Nurdjanah, and Joko Sasmito.

Miko added that initially there were two judges to be tried. However, the reported person with the initials MIT who is a Judge of the Manado State Administrative Court (PTUN) was not present, so the trial was postponed.

In his case, the MIT reported was also proposed by the Supreme Court to receive severe sanctions in the form of being dishonorably dismissed for alleged disciplinary violations.

"The trial was postponed because the reported party did not attend the trial," he concluded.