Why Did Joko Tjandra Cancel The Action Plan? Lawyers Say 'Doesn't Make Sense'

Joko Soegiarto Tjandra after being questioned by the AGO, Thursday, September 24 (Rizky Adytia P / VOI)

JAKARTA - Joko Tjandra's lawyer, Soesilo Aribowo, revealed the reason behind his client's interest in the action plan offered by Andi Irfan Jaya and prosecutor Pinangki Sirna Malasari. This action plan is related to the processing of a fatwa from the Supreme Court (MA) so that Joko Tjandra will be free from imprisonment in the transfer of Bank Bali collection rights.

"It is interesting because this is a matter of fatwa. Not yet (offered), he can not serve a 2-year sentence by taking several steps in the action plan," Soesilo told reporters, Thursday, September 24.

According to Soesilo, Joko Tjandra did not immediately accept the action plan. His client had time to think beforehand whether the fatwa could really save him.

"Yes, in the end he (Joko Tjandra) thought whether it could be done with a fatwa, whether it could be done with a fatwa," he said.

However, after reading the contents of the action plan in detail, said Soesilo, his client immediately changed his mind and canceled it. This is because Joko Tjandra felt that several points were not included and could not save him from being executed.

"After studying, reading, there are things that don't make sense, such as a fatwa, for example, that's a PK decision, a fatwa can't, it's impossible," he said.

Don't Know About King Maker

Meanwhile, another Joko Tjandra lawyer, Krisna Murti, said that his client did not know the king maker. Because the one who made the action plan was Andi Irfan.

"I don't know. Andi Irfan sent the action plan," Krisna told reporters, Thursday, September 24.

Apart from that, giving the action plan was also not done face-to-face. But through the WhatsApp short message application. So, Joko Tjandra only focused on reading the contents of the action plan without thinking about the king maker.

"This means that Andi Irfan discussed with who made it in Jakarta, then sent via Whatsapp to Mr. Joko, those who know the initials," he said.

Furthermore, after reading the action plan Joko Tjandra felt that he would be cheated by Andi Irfan and prosecutor Pinangki. Until finally contacted Anita Kolopaking and canceled the fatwa arrangement.

"After seeing the action plan, Pak Joko said a few days later, after reading it, he did not agree and was refused to send it to Anita. This is a fraud, said Pak Joko," he said.

The 10 action plan points proposed by Pinangki Sirna Malasari and Andi Irfan Jaya were not realized. Joko Soegiarto Tjandra also rejected the action plan by noting 'no;'.

The 1st action plan was the signing of the Security Deposit (Akta Kuasa Selling), which was meant by the defendant as a guarantee if the Security Deposit promised by Djoko Tjandra was not realized. The person in charge is JC (Joko Soegiarto Tjandra) and IR (Andi Irfan Jaya), which will be held on February 13, 2020 to February 23, 2020.

The second action plan was the delivery of a letter from the lawyer to BR (Burhanuddin / Official of the Attorney General's Office), which was intended by the defendant as a letter requesting a Supreme Court fatwa from the lawyer to the Attorney General's Office to be forwarded to the Supreme Court. The person in charge is IR (Andi Irfan Jaya) and AK (Dr. Anita Kolopaking), which will be held on 24 February 2020 to 25 February 2020.

The third action plan is that BR (Burhanuddin / Officials of the Attorney General's Office) sends a letter to HA (Hatta Ali / Supreme Court Officer) which Pinangki means as a follow-up to a letter from a lawyer regarding the Supreme Court Fatwa request. Responsible for this plan is IR (Andi Irfan Jaya) and P (Pinangki, the defendant) which will be implemented on February 26, 2020 to March 1, 2020.

The fourth action plan is the payment of 25 percent of P fee (Pinangki, the defendant) (250,000 US dollars), which is meant by Pinangki is the payment of phase I for the shortage of fees to the defendant of 1,000,000 (one million United States dollars) that has been paid Down The payment (DP) is 500,000 (five hundred thousand United States Dollar). The answerer for this action was JC (Joko Soegiarto Tjandra).

The 6th action plan is HA (Hatta Ali / Supreme Court Officer) in response to the letter BR (Burhanuddin / Supreme Court Officer), what the defendant meant was the response to the Supreme Court's letter to the Supreme Court's letter regarding the Supreme Court Fatwa Request. Responsible for this plan is HA (Hatta Ali / Supreme Court Officer) / DK (unknown) / AK (Dr. Anita Kolopaking), which will be implemented from March 6, 2020 to March 16, 2020.

The 7th action plan is for BR (Burhanuddin / Official of the Attorney General's Office) to issue instructions related to the letter HA (Hatta Ali / Supreme Court Officer). According to the prosecutor, Pinangki explained the plan of the Attorney General to instruct his subordinates to implement the Supreme Court fatwa. The person in charge for this plan is IF (unknown) / P (Pinangki / defendant), which will be implemented on March 16, 2020 to March 26, 2020.

The 8th action plan is US dollar Liquid Security Deposit (10,000,000). Pinangki called it JC's plan (Joko Soegiarto Tjandra) to pay this amount of money if the 2nd action plan point, 3rd point action plan and 6th point action plan and 7th action plan point is successfully implemented.

The person in charge for this plan is JC (Joko Soegiarto Tjandra), which will be implemented on March 26, 2020 to April 5, 2020. Meanwhile, the 9th action plan is JC (Joko Soegiarto Tjandra) to return to Indonesia.

The 10th action plan is the payment of a 25% P (250,000 US dollar) consultant fee, which Pinangki meant as a phase I payment (repayment) for the shortage of fees to the defendant of 1,000,000 (one million United States dollars) which had already been paid down payment. (DP) of 500,000 (five hundred thousand United States dollars) if Joko Soegiarto Tjandra returns to Indonesia as the 9th Action.