JAKARTA - Inspector General Napoleon Bonaparte was said to have been emotional when carrying out the reconstruction of the alleged removal of Djoko Tjandra's red notice. This was because Tommy Sumardi's investigation report (BAP) did not match the facts on the ground.

"There is a mismatch between the BAP and the facts on the ground because yesterday the reconstruction referred to more information from TS," said Inspector General Napoleon Bonaparte's attorney, Putri Maya Rumantik, to VOI, Friday, August 28.

One of them is the BAP regarding the giving of money from Tommy Sumardi to Inspector General Napoleon and Brigadier General Prasetyo Utomo. Both of them also refused to do the demonstration. This is because they admit that they never received money from Tommy Sumardi.

Then, he said, the BAP said that the meeting with Inspector General Napoleon did not match the facts on the ground. This is because, he said, his client felt that he had never met Tommy Sumardi.

"The strange thing is that the CCTV is on the 1st floor, while Mr. Napoleon's office is on the 11th floor, but as if directed by TS, it is like meeting with you. So there is a mismatch which they think is not true," said Putri.

However, not all of the BAP results were not acknowledged by Inspector General Napoleon. There are several points that are admittedly true. However, it was not explained in detail about this.

"There are also those that we admit, we also reject. There are several points that we do not admit to being true," he said.

In this case the police have named four people as suspects. They are Inspector General Napoleon Bonaparte and Brigadier General Prasetyo Utomo. Both are suspected as recipients of bribes for red notice removal.

Both of them were charged with Article 5 Paragraph 2, Article 11 and Article 12 letters a and b of Law Number 20 of 2020 concerning Corruption (Tipikor) in conjunction with Article 55 of the Criminal Code.

While the other two people are bribes. They are Djoko Tjandra and Tommy Sumardi. Both of them were charged under Article 5 Paragraph 1, Article 13 of Law 20/2020 concerning Corruption Crime (Tipikor) in conjunction with Article 55 of the Criminal Code.

In the bribery case, investigators confiscated US $ 20 thousand as evidence.


The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)