CIBINONG - The issue of Domestic Violence (KDRT) is one of the main highlights in the divorce trial of Eza Gionino and Meiza Aulia. Eza's attorney, Raka Danira, finally spoke up and gave a confession regarding verbal violence.
When asked about the alleged domestic violence, Raka Danira stated that his client rarely did this. However, he did not deny that violence in verbal form had occurred.
"The domestic violence is only limited to verbal and so on. If it reaches a very bad domestic violence, it doesn't exist," Raka explained at the Cibinong Religious Court, Monday, December 1.
When further questioned whether it means that verbal domestic violence has been carried out, he also confirmed it. "Yes, maybe it has been done verbally, maybe yes, harsh words and like that," he admitted.
This confession seems to be justification for one of the reasons for the divorce filed by Echa. The main trigger for the separation is said to be an ongoing argument.
SEE ALSO:
Meanwhile, Echa's party, represented by his attorney, Rendi Rumapea, gave a signal that there was more than verbal violence. This implies the evidence they submitted to the court.
Although refusing to answer clearly, Rendi hinted at evidence of physical violence. "There is a video, there is a chat, yes, there is still other supporting evidence, CCTV is also there," he said.
When asked further, Rendi seemed to justify the existence of a physical domestic violence. "If so, yes. It's terrible," he said, which could be interpreted as an indirect confession.
However, Echa emphasized that he would not bring the domestic violence problem to the criminal realm. They just want the evidence to be considered by the judge in granting the divorce suit.
The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)