Andre Taulany's Party Doesn't Deny Erin's Issues Are Rude To Employees, Calls It A Public Consumption

Andre Taulany and Erin (Instagram @erintauanya)

JAKARTA - The new chapter in the divorce process between Andre Taulany and Rien Wartia Trigina or Erin Taulany continues.

Andre Taulany's side, through his attorney, Galih Rakasiwi, gave a surprising statement regarding the slanted issue that befell Erin, one of which was the alleged harsh treatment of employees.

When met at the South Jakarta Religious Court on Friday, October 17, Galih Rakasiwi did not deny the widely circulated issues in the public. He stated that his party was not in a position to refute information that had already become public consumption.

"Yes, as I explained earlier, if the issue of rebuttal rather than (the Erin issue is rude to employees) that has been circulating, then you cannot argue," said Galih Rakasiwi.

Galih explained that some information, including the contents of the lawsuit that was once registered at the Tigaraksa Religious Court, can now be accessed freely by the public. This made his party surrender and submit a complete assessment to the public.

"Indeed, that (the contents of the lawsuit at the Tigaraksa Religious Court) can be uploaded, the point is that it can be accessed. But for now, it can't be done, right. So yes, Pak Haji termed it with his seriousness, even if for example there is also, yes, surrender, please refer to the term. the public has a lot to judge what it looks like, like that, "explained Galih Rakasiwi.

However, Galih emphasized that he would not speak further about the subject matter currently underway at the South Jakarta Religious Court. He is committed to maintaining the confidentiality of a closed trial process.

"Yes, if I am asked now, I will explain once again, I don't want to talk about the current subject matter. Because this is closed. I'm still keeping it. His name is also a closed Religious Court," he said.

He added that household matters are a realm of privacy that can only be fully understood by the couple who live it. "This is also the privacy of people, the internal affairs of people, right. It's a good thing about the husband and wife who know," he continued.

Andre Taulany's side realizes that the issues that have been circulating are out of their reach and have become public talks. "But apart from what is currently circulating, it's out of reach. It can be accessed by everyone. But actually the term has become public consumption," said Galih.

At the end of his statement, Galih said that Andre Taulany himself regretted this situation. According to him, Andre hopes that there will be clarification that can make things better for all parties.

"If Mr. Haji himself regrets that, right. That's why if you can attend, right. So let's have clarification too, it's both as good as that," he concluded.

Previously, it was alleged that the contents of Andre Taulany's lawsuit against his wife were spread on social media. In the contents of the scattered lawsuit, it was stated that Erin's relationship with Andre's family was not good.

"That the Respondent (Erin) cannot position himself as a wife of the Petitioner (Andre) in front of the big family of the Petitioner, the Respondent does not have a fairly good relationship with the families of the Petitioner's family," the upload read.

"In fact, it can be said. The Respondent rarely communicates with the applicant's extended family. So, often the Petitioner comes to the Pemoho family event, the Petitioner only comes alone and the Respondent does not participate. because he is hostile to the Petitioner's extended family," he continued.

Not only that, Erin is said to like being bad to employees who work at her house. He even burned their Household Assistant (ART) clothes.

"That the Respondent is always angry with the household assistant (ART) in managing the family. The respondent often insults and insults ART, drivers and security guards at home if there is a slight mistake, with offensive harsh words," wrote the upload.

"There have been several times that the security guard witness has reported to the Petitioner, if you see the Respondent cursing with dirty words and hitting the maid, and once there were also those whose clothes were burned by one of the household members. Even though it was only because of small sadness," he concluded.