Jonathan Frizzy's Attorney: Eye In Cash, No One Knows Vape Contains Ethodite

Jonathan Frizzy (Virgi/VOI)

JAKARTA - The trial of the alleged vape case containing a hard drug involving Jonathan Frizzy (Ijonk) was again held. Ijonk's legal team built their main defense on the argument that his client did not know that the vape he ordered contained a banned substance.

According to them, the condition of items that are sealed and do not have special characteristics makes it impossible for ordinary people to identify their contents without laboratory tests.

Andreas Nahot Silitonga, one of the attorneys, explained that even witnesses from the police and customs also admitted the difficulty.

"The most important thing is that in fact, in plain view, the two witnesses stated that it was very difficult to know what the content was like. Because what came was in a package and in the package, there was actually no writing that contained an ethomide," Andreas said at the Tangerang District Court, Wednesday, August 13.

He also emphasized that there were no suspicious codes or talks within the WhatsApp group created by Ijonk.

"In the WA group there is no talk of ethical issues, either directly or in the form of codes. Usually the prohibited items are in the form of codes," he added.

This defense is reinforced by the fact that the item is not specially hidden.

"It was carried in a backpack in the backpack there was a box. So, that's true, it doesn't mean it's hidden in socks," he explained.

Therefore, the legal counsel believes that it is very logical if Ijonk does not know the contents of the goods.