Commercial Court Rejects Application For PKPU Senopati Property Company, Finance Stays Healthy

Photo: Special

JAKARTA - The Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court rejected the PKPU Application submitted by Muhammad Marzuki against PT Asiana Senopati. Case Decision Number: 237/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2025/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst was decided on Monday, September 15, 2025. According to the legal team of PT Asiana Senopati, Arief Budiman, the Panel of Judges stated that the PKPU application submitted by the applicant did not have sufficient legal reasons and did not meet the requirements as stipulated in Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and PKPU. "This decision confirms the position of law and financial condition of PT Asiana Senopati to remain healthy, solid, and is able to fulfill obligations to its business partners," said Arief. Until now, continued Arief, PT Asiana Senopati has remained focused on carrying out its business activities, especially for the completion of ongoing projects in maintaining consumer trust. With the rejection of the PKPU's application, Arief emphasized that consumer interests would not be harmed. "The company remains well and healthy, as well as committed to maintaining the trust of stakeholders and continuing business activities continuously, he added. Meanwhile, regarding the problems raised by Muhammad Marzuki, the attorney of another PT Asiana Senopati, Welfrid Silalahi said, it was still in the process of trial in court. He explained that, before the PKPU application was submitted by Muhammad Marzuki, PT Asiana Senopati had reported allegations of criminal acts of fraud and/or embezzlement. PT Asiana Senopati has also filed a Law Against Law against Muhammad Marzuki. Until now these criminal cases and civil cases are still in legal proceedings. So our client is not without good faith, but the debt is still in a legal dispute'' clear Welfrid. He emphasized that his party respects all the court processes that have been running and will always obey and obey the laws that apply in Indonesia. "So all clear and clean. All parties must respect the court law decision, 'close Welfrid'.

JAKARTA - The Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court rejected the PKPU Application submitted by Muhammad Marzuki against PT Asiana Senopati. Case Decision Number: 237/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2025/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst was decided on Monday, September 15, 2025. According to the legal team of PT Asiana Senopati, Arief Budiman, the Panel of Judges stated that the PKPU application submitted by the applicant did not have sufficient legal reasons and did not meet the requirements as stipulated in Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and PKPU. "This decision confirms the position of law and financial condition of PT Asiana Senopati to remain healthy, solid, and is able to fulfill obligations to its business partners," said Arief. Until now, continued Arief, PT Asiana Senopati has remained focused on carrying out its business activities, especially for the completion of ongoing projects in maintaining consumer trust. With the rejection of the PKPU's application, Arief emphasized that consumer interests would not be harmed. "The company remains well and healthy, as well as committed to maintaining the trust of stakeholders and continuing business activities continuously, he added. Meanwhile, regarding the problems raised by Muhammad Marzuki, the attorney of another PT Asiana Senopati, Welfrid Silalahi said, it was still in the process of trial in court. He explained that, before the PKPU application was submitted by Muhammad Marzuki, PT Asiana Senopati had reported allegations of criminal acts of fraud and/or embezzlement. PT Asiana Senopati has also filed a Law Against Law against Muhammad Marzuki. Until now these criminal cases and civil cases are still in legal proceedings. So our client is not without good faith, but the debt is still in a legal dispute'' clear Welfrid. He emphasized that his party respects all the court processes that have been running and will always obey and obey the laws that apply in Indonesia. "So all clear and clean. All parties must respect the court law decision, 'close Welfrid'.

JAKARTA - The Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court rejected the PKPU Application submitted by Muhammad Marzuki against PT Asiana Senopati. Case Decision Number: 237/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2025/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst was decided on Monday, September 15, 2025. According to the legal team of PT Asiana Senopati, Arief Budiman, the Panel of Judges stated that the PKPU application submitted by the applicant did not have sufficient legal reasons and did not meet the requirements as stipulated in Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and PKPU. "This decision confirms the position of law and financial condition of PT Asiana Senopati to remain healthy, solid, and is able to fulfill obligations to its business partners," said Arief. Until now, continued Arief, PT Asiana Senopati has remained focused on carrying out its business activities, especially for the completion of ongoing projects in maintaining consumer trust. With the rejection of the PKPU's application, Arief emphasized that consumer interests would not be harmed. "The company remains well and healthy, as well as committed to maintaining the trust of stakeholders and continuing business activities continuously, he added. Meanwhile, regarding the problems raised by Muhammad Marzuki, the attorney of another PT Asiana Senopati, Welfrid Silalahi said, it was still in the process of trial in court. He explained that, before the PKPU application was submitted by Muhammad Marzuki, PT Asiana Senopati had reported allegations of criminal acts of fraud and/or embezzlement. PT Asiana Senopati has also filed a Law Against Law against Muhammad Marzuki. Until now these criminal cases and civil cases are still in legal proceedings. So our client is not without good faith, but the debt is still in a legal dispute'' clear Welfrid. He emphasized that his party respects all the court processes that have been running and will always obey and obey the laws that apply in Indonesia. "So all clear and clean. All parties must respect the court law decision, 'close Welfrid'.

JAKARTA - The Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court rejected the PKPU Application submitted by Muhammad Marzuki against PT Asiana Senopati.

Case Decision Number: 237/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2025/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst was decided on Monday, September 15, 2025.

According to the legal team of PT Asiana Senopati, Arief Budiman, the Panel of Judges stated that the PKPU application submitted by the applicant did not have sufficient legal basis and did not meet the requirements as stipulated in Law no. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and PKPU.

"This decision confirms that PT Asiana Senopati's legal position and financial condition remain healthy, solid, and able to fulfill obligations to its business partners," said Arief.

Until now, Arief continued, PT Asiana Senopati has remained focused on carrying out its business activities, especially for the completion of ongoing projects in maintaining consumer confidence.

With the rejection of the PKPU application, Arief emphasized that consumer interests will not be harmed.

"The company continues to run well and healthy, and is committed to continuing to maintain stakeholder confidence and continuing business activities on an ongoing basis," he added.

Meanwhile, regarding the problems raised by Muhammad Marzuki, another PT Asiana Senopati attorney, Welfrid Silalahi, said this was still in court.

He explained that before the PKPU application was submitted by Muhammad Marzuki, PT Asiana Senopati had reported allegations of fraud and/or embezzlement.

PT Asiana Senopati has also filed a Lawsuit against Muhammad Marzuki.

Until now, the criminal and civil cases are still in legal proceedings. So our client is not without good faith, but the debt is still under legal dispute," said Welfrid.

He emphasized that his party appreciates all the judicial processes that have been running and will always be obedient and obedient to the laws in force in Indonesia.

"So everything is clear and clean. All parties must respect the court's legal decision," concluded Welfrid.