PT HD Arjuna: Land Dispute Resolved in Court

Illustration of the court (Antara)

JAKARTA - The dispute over land ownership which is the location of the establishment of the Club de Arjuna in South Kedoya, West Jakarta, has again become a concern. In the midst of the emergence of ownership claims from other parties, PT HD Arjuna's lawyer asked all parties to settle through the legal channel to avoid potential conflicts in the field.

The lawyer for PT HD Arjuna, Denny Kailimang, emphasized that the company he represented was the legitimate holder of the land. According to him, ownership is evidenced by a certificate issued by the Ministry of Agrarian and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN).

Denny said the land had been owned by PT HD Arjuna for more than 10 years. In addition to being used as a company asset, all administrative obligations, including the payment of Land and Building Taxes (PBB), are said to have been met.

"We hold the right based on the certificate issued by the National Land Agency. We have bought and mastered the land for more than 10 years, it has been built, utilized, and all obligations such as Land and Building Taxes (PBB) have also been paid," said Denny in his statement, Wednesday, July 8.

He emphasized that if there were other parties claiming to have rights to the land, the settlement must be carried out through legal mechanisms in court, not through unilateral actions.

"If there is a party who feels that they have rights, please file a lawsuit in court. You can't take action on your own, enter or take possession of land unilaterally. Our country is a legal state," he said.

According to Denny, the execution of an object that is still disputed can only be carried out based on a court decision that has the force of law and is carried out by the authorized authorities.

"Execution can only be carried out by the court. Outside of that mechanism, it is an action that is not justified by law," he said.

As an effort to obtain legal protection, PT HD Arjuna has also reported the alleged criminal act of entering the grounds without rights to the police. This step was taken to prevent clashes on the ground and to seek legal protection for parties claiming to be rights holders.

Denny also reminded that ownership claims based on girik documents must still be proven through legal processes. According to him, this provision is in line with Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021 concerning Management Rights, Rights over Land, Housing Units, and Land Registration.

"If someone claims based on the girik, of course it must be proven in accordance with the applicable law. All parties have the right to prove their arguments in court," he said.

In this case, there are two reports that have been submitted to the police. The first report was made by the power of the land owner, Antonius Tony Riyanto, to the West Jakarta Metro Police on June 12, 2026. Meanwhile, the second report was submitted by the power of the manager of Club de Arjuna, Sonny Surya Saputra, to the Polda Metro Jaya on June 28, 2026. Both reports are currently still under investigation.

Previously, PT HD Arjuna stated that the land that became the location of the Club de Arjuna was a company asset owned based on three Building Use Rights Certificates (SHGB) Numbers 3523, 3524, and 3525 issued by the Ministry of ATR/BPN.

Legal PT HD Arjuna, Helmi Suhardie, said the company obtained the land through a sale and purchase transaction with PT Supra Pramesti Sakti in 2008. He emphasized that the three SHGBs are still valid and have never been canceled through a court decision that has the force of law

According to Helmi, to date there is also no decision in a civil case that requires PT HD Arjuna to pay compensation to another party related to the ownership of the land. The company also refers to a number of criminal decisions that have become legally binding, which states that disputes regarding ownership documents are a civil matter.