Soon The Criminal Investigation Unit Will Determine The Tangerang Sea Pagar Tersangka

The Criminal Investigation Unit of the National Police will conduct a case in the near future regarding the alleged forgery of the deed of land for the sea fence in the waters of Tangerang Regency. Hold the case this time, to determine the suspect.

The Director of General Crimes at Bareskrim Polri, Brigadier General Djuhandani Rahardjo Puro, said that the title of the case was carried out because investigators considered that the witness examination process was sufficient. So, it remains only to wait for the results of the examination of evidence by the Forensic Laboratory (Labfor) team.

"So we don't have any more examinations, maybe if there are a few additions. In principle, we will test whether in the Forensic Laboratory the results of this Forensic Laboratory will be used as material for the stay," said Djuhandani to reporters, Friday, February 14.

The process of testing the evidence in the form of 263 warkah tanah is expected to be completed in a few days. So, later investigators will immediately conduct a case title to determine the suspect.

"It is possible that in the past few days from Labfor it will be able to provide certainty, so that we can immediately determine whether it is possible to determine whether the suspect is determined or not," said Djuhandani.

In handling this case, investigators have examined 44 witnesses, including the Head of Kohod Village, Arsin. From the examination, it was found that there was a mode of deed forgery carried out by the reported party, Arsin, and several other parties who collaborated to make a fake deed to be used in the application for recognition of rights.

In addition, the alleged deed forgery in the form of a building rights certificate (SHGB) and a title certificate (SHM) in the sea fence area were carried out by profiting the identities of residents.

"From the results of the initial examination that we carried out on several residents, it was indeed used," said Djuhandani.

The identity profiting was carried out by asking residents' Identity Cards (KTP). However, the purpose and purpose of borrowing the identity submitted to residents is not appropriate.

"His name was taken by asking for an ID card, a photocopy of an ID card which was finally appeared in these letters," he said