Vadel Badjideh Claims There Are Irregularities In The Case Of Alleged Immorality, Nikita Mirzani Confused

JAKARTA - Nikita Mirzani's attorney, Fahmi Bachmid, tried to respond regarding Vadel Badjideh's statement that there were irregularities in the handling of reports of alleged immorality.

Fahmi Bachmid admitted that he was confused by the statement from Vadel Badjideh. He assumed that Vadel did not understand the case involving them.

"Please, where are the irregularities. If you are confused, yes, use the confusing article. If you are more and more confused, what will be done will be more chaotic. So, like that. So, he may be confused about this case," said Fahmi Bachmid at the South Jakarta Metro Police, Thursday, November 7th.

However, for Fahmi this is something natural because Vadel did not know about the witness brought by Nikita Mirzani until the evidence was submitted.

"Because there is not a single one you know who the witness I brought. You don't even know what happened. All of Nikita knows. From A to Z I told Nikita. Even Nikita knows the results of the post-mortem. The witness said whatever Nikita knows," added Fahmi Bachmid.

Fahmi even gave advice to Vadel Badjideh to follow all ongoing processes so that he could understand the case well.

"So, just focus on the people you defend. So, there is no need to go there or there. So, if you are confused, don't invite all people to participate in the process of confusion. No need. So, if you are confused about this case, the process will follow," he said.