Bahlil, Rules, And Election Integrity

When Bahlil Lahadalia, the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources who is also the General Chairperson of the Golkar Party, spoke about "breaking the rules as long as it doesn't get caught," many were surprised. Bahlil's statement was made at the Consolidation Meeting for Winning the Provincial, Regency and City Elections throughout West Java Province. This statement came amidst the tension ahead of the 2024 Regional Elections, where election integrity is the main focus. It is not surprising that this statement invited strong reactions from various groups. Not only because of its ethical implications, but also because it shows how far we have deviated from the basic principles of democracy.

In the many news and analyses that have been published, several fundamental questions have arisen. Is it true, as Bahlil stated, that breaking the rules can be justified as long as it is not revealed? Does this reflect the current political situation which is filled with momentary interests? He emphasized that if the violation is not caught, then it is considered okay. This raises deep concerns about how we view law and ethics in politics.

The Secretary General of the Golkar Party, Lodewijk F. Paulus, defended Bahlil Lahadalia by saying that his statement was just a joke. Let's just say it was a joke, but Bahlil's comment shows a bigger phenomenon. In a world filled with allegations of election fraud and reports of violations, can we still joke about integrity? The Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu) has found 347 violations during the election quiet period throughout Indonesia, the most of which occurred in North Sumatra. This number further raises concerns about the neutrality and integrity of the election administration.

Integrity is the keyword in this context. The Ministry of State Apparatus Empowerment (KemenPAN) underlines the importance of integrity for leaders as the foundation of an accountable government. However, the fact that as many as 1,385 officials have been imprisoned for corruption during Jokowi's administration shows that integrity is still a serious challenge. Can we expect integrity from politicians if they themselves are not committed to complying with existing regulations?

Election fraud is a problem that continues to loom. Monitoring reports indicate alleged violations of ASN neutrality during the 2024 election. This is a phenomenon that cannot be ignored. How can the people believe that their votes will be valued? How can voters be confident that their choices will change the future, if their leaders treat rule-breaking as commonplace?

In a broader context, Bahlil’s comments, who is the chairman of a major party, reflect a habit where political interests often override moral and ethical principles. In a healthy democracy, leaders should be role models for their people. However, what Bahlil shows is the harsh reality where the ends justify the means.

Therefore, a firm stance needs to be demonstrated. We cannot allow violations of the rules as part of a political "strategy". If we want to have a credible and trusted election system, then it is time for all parties, including politicians, to prioritize integrity and commitment to the law. Only in this way can we build public trust in the democratic process.

Once again, Bahlil Lahadalia's statement is not just a joking statement. This is a reflection of the integrity crisis that we are facing in the world of politics today. To change this paradigm, a joint effort is needed from all elements of society. Without awareness and commitment to uphold ethics and integrity, the ideals of a clean and accountable democracy will only remain a dream. If we do not act now, we will be trapped in an endless cycle of violations and fraud.