Nurul Ghufron Reports KPK Council To The Criminal Investigation Unit Of The Police
JAKARTA - Deputy Chairman of the KPK Commission, Nurul Ghufron, reported the KPK Supervisory Board to the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Police. This report was made on May 6.
From a VOI source, Ghufron reported that the KPK Supervisory Board submitted the alleged ethical violation he had committed to journalists.
It is known that Ghufron is currently undergoing a series of ethical hearings because he is suspected of abusing his authority as Deputy Chair of the KPK because he helps transfer an employee at the Ministry of Agriculture (Kementan). In the process, the KPK Supervisory Board often provides explanations to the media.
... The occurrence of criminal acts of humiliation and/or abuse of authority related to the submission to the press regarding ethical violations of the leadership of the Corruption Eradication Commission on behalf of Nurul Ghufron is sufficient evidence and ready to be tried and handling the examination of violations of the KPK leadership code of ethics related to the alleged intervention of the ASN mutation of the Ministry of Agriculture as referred to in Article 310 of the Criminal Code and/or Article 421 which occurred in Jakarta in the period until May 2024, Thus quoted from the documents submitted by the source to VOI.ID, May 20.
The report, which was carried out by Ghufron, was registered with the number LP/B/138/V/2024/SPKT/Bareskrim Polri.
VOI has tried to clarify to Nurul Ghufron regarding his reporting on the KPK Supervisory Board. However, no reply has been received.
As previously reported, the KPK Supervisory Board held an ethics trial against the Deputy Chairperson of the KPK, Nurul Ghufron, on Tuesday, May 14. This process was carried out because he was suspected of abusing his authority in dealing with the mutation of an employee of the Ministry of Agriculture (Kementan).
During the trial, six witnesses were summoned and questioned. Among them were KPK Deputy Chair Alexander Marwata and Ministry of Agriculture employees who were assisted with the mutation.
SEE ALSO:
The employee whose mutation was assisted by Ghufron was his friend's son-in-law. He admitted that he was moved because of a sense of humanity and the process was unfair.
Because, when the employee submits a refusal mutation, it is carried out on the grounds of a shortage of human resources (HR). However, the employee was allowed to resign when submitting.