The Reason Ganjar Gives A 5th Value To Prabowo Is Because The Target Is Not Achieved

CILACAP - Presidential candidate number 3 Ganjar Pranowo revealed the reason for providing a 5-value for the performance of the Ministry of Defense under the leadership of Prabowo Subianto.

Ganjar said the value was given because the Ministry of Defense's performance was not achieved.

"Yes, because the target has not been achieved," said Ganjar in Cilacap, Central Java, as reported by ANTARA, Tuesday, January 9.

In addition, Prabowo also does not have a defense white paper. The Indonesian Defense White Book is a mandate of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 2002 concerning National Defense.

Article 16 paragraph 4 explains that the "defense white paper" is a comprehensive defense policy statement published by the minister and disseminated to the general public, both domestic and international, to create mutual trust and eliminate potential conflicts.

"Then the scores from the world data that I showed yesterday show a declining condition," he said.

Previously, in the third debate of the 2024 presidential election at Istora Senayan, Jakarta, Sunday (7/1) night, Ganjar Pranowo gave a 5-value for the performance of the Ministry of Defense under the leadership of Prabowo Subianto.

"Five too," said Ganjar.

Ganjar conveyed this when answering questions from presidential candidate number 1 Anies Baswedan regarding Ganjar's assessment of the performance of the Ministry of Defense after ever giving a 5-value in law enforcement in Indonesia.

Ganjar claims to have data related to the performance of the Ministry of Defense so that it can provide a score of 5. However, in the debate, Ganjar did not convey further the data.

Hearing the assessment, Anies said Ganjar gave too high a score. The Ministry of Defense's performance score should be below 5 because the welfare of members of the TNI and police is still not seriously considered by the Ministry of Defense.

"In my opinion, the score is below five, Mas Ganjar. Five are heights," said Anies.

Ganjar then asked Anies to provide a specific value, not just mentioning under 5. Anies then replied that he would give a value of 11 out of 100.