3 New Points In Ari Wibowo's New Divorce Lawsuit, The Focus Of The Third Person And The Distribution Of Assets

JAKARTA - After mediation was declared a failure some time ago, Ari Wibowo through his attorney, Ricky Saragih, filed a new lawsuit against his wife, Inge Anugrah.

Ricky said that his client's new lawsuit had been submitted to the panel of judges at the South Jakarta District Court (PN). He said there were several changes to the previous lawsuit.

"It's clear, we have submitted the original lawsuit letter. Then, we have also submitted the amendment to the lawsuit which we have submitted to the panel of judges. The judge has also examined the two documents and has examined them, so that the progress of the next trial event is the defendant's answer," said Ricky Saragih at the South Jakarta District Court on Monday, June 12.

Meanwhile, the main thing in the lawsuit changes filed was the reason Ari had an argument with Inge, which was the reason for the divorce suit being filed.

"There are several things we add from the previous lawsuit that was registered through e court by the previous legal adviser. In essence, the lawsuit spoke in general without explaining the reasons for the quarrel in Ari and Inge's household. Therefore, we consider it necessary, so we changed, to be precise, adding things related to the quarrel," said Ricky.

Here are three points for Ari Wibowo's new divorce suit.

1. The existence of the Third Person as the Reason for the Divorce Lawsuit Ricky Saragih stated that the lawsuit that Ari Wibowo had just filed included the existence of a third person as the cause of the unharmony of the household, which was later decided to end the 17-year-old household.

"For the third person, it has entered the subject matter of the case, and this is a closed trial, so we'll just see if we can prove it later," said Ricky.

"The point is the cause of this divorce because there is a third party. So, who is it, what happened, where it happened, when, we will see that in the evidence," he continued.

Meanwhile, Sapar Sujud as Inge Anugrah's attorney again stated that his client did not have an affair. He asked Ari Wibowo to prove his accusation.

"From Inge himself, I have told us that a third party is not true. Therefore, I as his attorney ask to be proven in court. Because if it is a third party, the assumption is not cheating, right, if you say cheating, it is already a crime. Because only third parties, I ask to be proven later the accusation," said Sapar Sujud.

2. Custody of the rule of law, Ari Wibowo, stated that his client would not prohibit children from meeting his biological mother. He made sure this also happened after Ari and Inge officially divorced.

From the start, neither we nor Ari have ever prohibited meeting their mothers. Until today and until later this is decided to divorce, there is no desire or plan for Ari to separate his child from his biological mother," said Ricky.

Although Ari Wibowo wants custody of his two children, Kenzo and Marco, Ricky stated that changes in the new lawsuit will not limit Inge to meet her child.

"So, that is also the point in changing our lawsuit. But a little explained that in the future what it will be like, namely that children will not be cut off, they will meet whenever they want, they can meet their mother at any time. Likewise Inge, whenever Inge wants, he can meet his son," he said.

3. Distribution of Assets In his divorce suit, Ari Wibowo has no intention of dividing Gono-gini assets. The division of assets in this case is based on an agreement that has been agreed upon.

The separation of assets was made, agreed by the parties in May 2006. So, it happened before the marriage actually took place. So, both parties agreed and understood what the consequences were for the marriage agreement, "said Ricky.

"It is the marriage agreement that is the legal basis for saying there is no distribution of Gono-gini assets in this divorce case," he continued.

Explaining further about the agreement in question, Ricky said that property during marriage on behalf of Ari would automatically belong to Ari after the divorce.

Ari's property belongs to Ari and Inge's property is owned by Inge, the concept is different from Gono-gini's property. Gono-gini's property is divided into two, now this may not be exactly divided into two, there is something bigger on one side. Thus, one becomes smaller," concluded Ricky Saragih, Ari Wibowo's attorney.

Ari Wibowo and Inge Anugrah (Instagram @ariwibowo_official)