Mario Dandy Persecuted, David Ozora's Recovery Level Is Only 5 Percent
JAKARTA - Doctor of Mayapada Hospital Kuningan, dr. Yeremia Tatang said it was unlikely that David Ozora could fully recover after being persecuted by Mario Dandy Satriyo. In fact, the percentage is only 5 percent.
The view of dr. Jeremiah began when Chief Judge Alimin Ribut questioned about David Ozora's condition and the percentage of his diagnosed recovery suffered an axonal injury or serious head injury.
"This is a serious head injury, right, the diffuse axional injury. In this kind of case, according to your opinion, how much can you recover?" asked Judge Alimin during a trial at the South Jakarta District Court, Thursday, July 20.
"Small Your Majesty," replied Yeremia.
In fact, he said, it was possible that David could recover as before, only 5 percent. The reason is that the brain injury he suffered is in the severe category.
"It's small, can your little brother's opinion be percentageed?" asked Judge Alimin.
"Wow, in my opinion, in the case of the axional diffuse injury case like this, this is less than 5 percent. Because the initial condition of the GCS was 3," said Yeremia.
"What do you mean (GCS)?" said the judge.
"The level of awareness is deep comma," said Yeremia.
Hearing this statement, Judge Alimin changed his question. Jeremiah was asked to give his views on whether or not David could be independent. This means that he does not need the help of others to strengthen his life.
"Can the expert say in other words this child will depend on other people for the rest of his life?" asked Judge Alimin.
"Yes, it can, or not. Now what is being a concert is how we can provide therapy psychology for the child so that he can return to normal what he should be. This is still not recovering because it is," said Yeremia.
As a reminder, Mario Dandy was charged with serious abuse. He brutally beat David Ozora's head.
اقرأ أيضا:
As a result of the persecution, David Ozora was seriously injured. In fact, he had to undergo medical treatment for a long time.
Mario Dandy in this case was charged with Article 76 c in conjunction with Article 80 paragraph 2 of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection.
While Shane Lukas is said to have helped in the series of persecutions. He videoed Mario Dandy's actions.
Thus, the prosecutor charged him with Article 355 paragraph 1 to 1 of the Criminal Code Junto Article 55 Paragraph 1 to 1 of the Criminal Code and a subsidiary of Article 355 paragraph 2 in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 to 1 of the primary Criminal Code with Article 355 paragraph 1 to 1 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with 56 of the 2nd Criminal Code.