Jasa Marga's Response To The Former Director Of JJC Named A Corruption Suspect For The MBZ Toll Road

Investigators from the Directorate General of Special Crimes at the Attorney General's Office have named three suspects in corruption in the construction of the MBZ Toll Road. (Photo: Doc. ANTARA)

PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk respects the ongoing legal process related to the determination of the suspect in the alleged corruption case in the construction of the Jakarta-Cikampek II elevated Toll Road, aka the MBZ Toll Road from Cikunir to West Karawang.

The former Jasa Marga employee who has just been named a suspect is Djoko Dwijono (DD), as the former President Director of PT Jasa Marga Jalan Layang Cikampek (JJC) for the 2016-2020 period.

"Jasa Marga respects the applicable legal decisions and is committed to supporting the legal process that runs cooperatively during the investigation process involving former Jasa Marga employees," Jasa Marga wrote in a written statement, quoted Thursday, September 14.

Jasa Marga also said that this corruption case would not interfere with the company's performance and ongoing business planning.

"We can convey that the ongoing legal cases have no impact on the company's activities, both operationally and financially," he explained.

Furthermore, Jasa Marga will be committed to always upholding integrity, the principles of transparency and professionalism and always guided by the principles of Good Corporate Governance (GCG).

It is known that the Junior Attorney General's Investigator for Special Crimes at the Attorney General's Office has named three suspects in the alleged corruption case of the construction of the Jakarta-Cikampek (Japek) II Toll Road to West Karawang or MBZ.

The three suspects, Yudhi Mahyudin (YM) as the Chair of the JJC Auction Committee, Toni Budianto Sihige (FFB) as a bridge expert at PT LAPI Ganesatama Consulting, and Djoko Dwijono (DD) as the President Director of PT Jasa Marga Jalan Layang Cikampek (JJC) for the 2016-2020 period.

The suspects are suspected of violating Article 2 Paragraph (1) and Article 3 in conjunction with Article 18 of the Corruption Eradication Law in conjunction with Article 55 Paragraph (1) of the 1st Criminal Code. In this case, investigators have examined a total of 146 witnesses.