What Witness Examination Separated From Mario Dandy Shane Lukas So There Is No Pressure

Public Relations Of The South Jakarta District Court, Djuyamto/ Photo: Jehan/VOI

JAKARTA - Public Relations of the South Jakarta District Court (Jaksel), Djuyamto explained the reasons for the examination of Anastasia Pretya Amanda or APA (19) separately with Mario Dandy (20) and Shane Lukas (19) during the witness examination trial at the AG follow-up trial.

"So each of them gives the information that they are free according to what the witness really knows and is natural to himself, if the panel considers that there is nothing that needs to be confronted, it is not necessary. Later, the panel will say which information will be taken into consideration by the panel by the judge," Djuyamto told reporters at the South Jakarta District Court, Wednesday, April 5.

Djuyamto said there was no face-to-face between Amanda and Shane and Mario Dandy.

"Nothing, this has run out for witness examination, it was finished yesterday," he said.

Regarding the different statements of witnesses when giving statements, said Djuyamto, it was the dynamics of the trial. According to him, it was the freedom of witnesses when giving statements.

"Yes, it's normal, it means that in the facts in the dynamics of the trial, it's okay for the witness to provide free information, the important thing is that it really explains what it is according to what he sees, he hears and he experiences it himself," he explained.