Partager:

Polda Merto Jaya will examine four additional witnesses to strengthen the alleged planning element in the case of David Ozora's persecution by Mario Dandy Satryo. One of them is a whispering figure, Anastasia Pretya Amanda alias APA. "Yes, (APA) came in from that part (the witness to be examined)," said Head of Public Relations of Polda Metro Jaya Kombes Trunoyudo Wisnu Andiko to reporters, Wednesday, March 15. Meanwhile, the other three witnesses are still children. So, there is no detail about his identity. Even with the time of examination. "Among them are witnesses, there are also children who are in conflict with the law, namely as witnesses," he said. With the three witnesses who are still children, the pattern of handling will also be in accordance with the child protection law. Of course, by involving related institutions and institutions. "Investigators with the existence of professional collaboration are still conducting a series of procedural investigations by referring to the child protection law. Then the juvenile justice system and coupled with the criminal procedural law book," said Trunoyudo. Meanwhile, Trunoyudo had mentioned that the examination of the four witnesses was aimed at strengthening the existence of an element of planning behind the persecution of David Ozora by Mario Dandy Satryo. "Calling 4 other witnesses is related to strengthening. Our note at the time of yesterday's release was strengthening in the process of investigating alleged planning in the serious persecution committed by Mario Cs," said Trunoyudo. For information, in this case, Mario Dandy, Shane Lukas, and AG were charged with different articles Mario Dandy is suspected of being under Article 355 of the Criminal Code paragraph 1 subsidiary Article 354 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code, which is more subsidiary to Article 353 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code, which is more subsidiary to Article 352 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code. Then, Article 76c junto Article 80 of the Child Protection Law. Meanwhile, AG is charged with Article 76 c in conjunction with Article 80 of the Child Protection Law and or 355 paragraph 1 Jo 56 subsidiary 353 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code subsidiary 351 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code. Meanwhile, Shane Lukas was charged with Article 355 paragraph 1 in conjunction with 56 of the Criminal Code, subsidiary 354 paragraph 1 of the Kuhp jo 56 of the Criminal Code, more than subsidiary 353 paragraph 2 in conjunction with 56 of the Criminal Code, more than subsidiary 351 paragraph 2 and or 76c in conjunction with Article 80 of the Child Protection Law.

The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)