Today Is David Ozora's Persecution Reconstruction, It Is Possible That Mario Dandy Will Not Be Accompanied By His Family

Mario Dandy, son of the former Ministry of Finance's tax official who abused David at Pesanggrahan, South Jakarta on Monday, February 20. (Antara)

JAKARTA - Suspect Mario Dandy may not be accompanied by his family members while undergoing reconstruction of the persecution case against David Ozora.

The possibility refers to the testimony of his lawyer, Dolfie Rompas. This is because he said he did not know whether Mario's family was present or not, including his father Rafael Alun Trisambodo.

"I don't know about that yet," said Dolfie to VOI, Friday, March 10.

The reconstruction of the persecution case against David Ozora is planned to be held at the scene or Green Permata Housing, Pesanggrahan, South Jakarta, today at 14.00 WIB.

Later, all the suspects, namely Mario Dandy and Shane Lukas as well as the perpetrators of the child, AG, will be presented in person.

They will perform 23 scenes. It is possible from the beginning of planning to the act of persecution by Mario Dandy.

Director of General Criminal Investigation of Polda Metro Jaya Kombes Hengki Haryadi said the purpose of the reconstruction was to find agreement between the testimony of witnesses and perpetrators and the evidence that had been collected.

"We can see from the combination of several pieces of evidence of witness testimony from the suspect's statement, including the elements of the article that we have submitted," said Hengki.

For information, in this case, Mario Dandy, Shane Lukas, and AG were charged with different articles.

Mario Dandy is suspected of being under Article 355 of the Criminal Code paragraph 1 subsidiary Article 354 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code, which is more subsidiary to Article 353 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code, which is more subsidiary to Article 352 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code. Then, Article 76c junto Article 80 of the Child Protection Law.

Meanwhile, AG is charged with Article 76 c in conjunction with Article 80 of the Child Protection Law and or 355 paragraph 1 Jo 56 subsidiary 353 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code subsidiary 351 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code.