Polda Metro Opens Opportunities To Check Again What Figures To Confront With Mario Dandy-Shane Lukas

Mario Dandy and AG (Photo: Twitter)

JAKARTA - Polda Metro Jaya has opened the possibility that it will examine again the figure of Apa who is said to be the trigger for the persecution by Mario Dandy Satryo against David Ozora. Meanwhile, APA informed Mario about David's bad actions against AG. That information sparked the anger of Rafael Alun Trisambodo's son. "If we need it for an examination, we will re-examine it at Polda Metro Jaya," said Director of General Criminal Investigation of Polda Metro Jaya Kombes Hengki Haryadi to reporters, Wednesday, March 8. In fact, it is possible that APA will be confronted with Mario and Shean Lukas. Thus, the initial series behind the persecution action will become clear. "We will call we will confront several suspects. So there is nothing else, equality before the law. This is what we always emphasize," said Hengki. For information, in the case of David's persecution, there are several developments. First, the police decided to detain AG at the social welfare organization (LPKS) for 7 days. Then, AG is formulated by Article 76 c in conjunction with Article 80 of the Child Protection Law and or 355 paragraph 1 Jo 56 subsidiary 353 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code subsidiary 351 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code. Mario Dandy was sanctioned with a heavier article. Now, he is charged with Article 355 of the Criminal Code, paragraph 1 subsidiary Article 354 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code, which is more subsidiary to Article 353 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code, which is more subsidiary to Article 352 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code. Then, Article 76c junto Article 80 of the child protection law. Then, for Shane Lukas, he was charged with Article 355 paragraph 1 in conjunction with 56 of the Criminal Code, subsidiary 354 paragraph 1 of the Kuhp junto 56 of the Criminal Code, more than subsidiary 353 paragraph 2 in conjunction with 56 of the Criminal Code, more than subsidiary 351 paragraph 2 and or 76c junto Article 80 of the Child Protection Law.