It Is Considered That The Police Chief Judge Of The South Jakarta District Court Trains Putri Candrawati Up To The Singgung 95 Members Who Are Tried For Ethics

Putri Chandrawathi (Photo: Rizky AP/VOI)

The presiding judge Wahyu Iman Santoso assessed that Putri Candrawati's testimony regarding the premeditated murder case of Nopriansyah Yosua Hutabarat or Brigadier J had cornered the National Police institution. Especially when it comes to the matter of the official funeral procession against Brigadier J. Putri Candrawathi's statement, which was considered to have cornered the National Police, was made when the judge explained about one of the conditions behind the funeral procession for members of the Bhayangkara Corps. At that time, Putri said she did not know the terms in question. Especially the padarium against Brigadier J. In fact, Ferdy Sambo's wife even argued that the judge should ask the Police directly. "Even if the National Police gives a funeral like that, I also don't know, maybe it can be asked to the National Police institution, why can I give awards to people who have raped, and abused and threatened me as Bhayangkari," said Putri at the trial at the South Jakarta District Court, Monday, December 12. Hearing that question, the judge called Putri if there were 95 members of the National Police who were sanctioned by the code of ethics because they were dragged into the premeditated murder case of Brigadier J. "You know that as a result of the incident at Duren Tiga's house, 95 police officers were brought to the code of ethics and this is the biggest event in police history. Now from your statement earlier, you have cornered again about, from the National Police Headquarters. It is very unfair with your statement like that," said the judge. However, Putri denied it could be said to have cornered the Police. This is because her husband, Ferdy Sambo, was a member of the Bhayangkara Corps before being fired because of the Brigadier J case. "Sorry Your Majesty, I have never cornered the Polri institution, where my husband loves the Polri institution very much, and the uniform," said Putri. In fact, Putri had mentioned that she had surrendered to the sanctions she would receive. Thus, all his statements were claimed to be the facts he knew. "I have never spoken out and conveyed what I feel all this time. I am just silent because I sincerely carry out all of this, because I only surrender to God," said Putri. Putri Candrawathi was presented as a witness for the defendants Bharada Richard Elieze, Bripka Ricky Rizal, and Strong Ma'ruf. Meanwhile, the three of them in this case were charged with helping and supporting Ferdy Sambo's plans. Thus, they are strongly suspected of violating Article 340 of the Criminal Code, subsidiary to Article 338 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 to (1) of the Criminal Code.