The Judge Arrested The Propam Member Witness, Luput Regarding The Order Of Hendra Kurniawan-Agus Nurpatra

Deputy Head of Detachment C Paminal Bureau of the National Police Propam Division, AKBP Radite Hernawa/Rizky AP/VOI

The panel of judges at the South Jakarta District Court sprayed Deputy Head of Detachment C of the Paminal Bureau of the Propam Police Division, AKBP Radite Hernawa, for not confirming the completeness of the files related to the investigation into the case of the death of Nopriansyah Yosua Hutabarat alias Brigadier J. The judge's reprimand began when the team's advisory team, Hendra Kurniawan and Agus Nurpatra, Henry Yosodiningrat, raised questions about his client's actions that were not in accordance with the rules. Meanwhile, the rules deemed violated are, Regulation of the National Police Chief Number 6 of 2019 and Perkadiv Propam Number 1 of 2015 concerning Standard Operating of Internal Security Investigation Procedures within the Police. "Which explanation makes you conclude that the act is not in accordance with the main duties and actions that are not in accordance with the Perkap and Perkadiv?" Henry asked during a trial at the South Jakarta District Court, Thursday, December 1. "In delivering explanations to investigators, there has never been an information report or warrant (sprin)," replied Radite. Hearing this statement, Henry then showed his client's sprin as a result of the coordination of the Police Propam Division with Polda Metro Jaya. Witness Radite seemed confused. Because, he had never seen the sprin. "If I show that there is a SP or special information report on the task of investigating full buckets and clarifying the truth within the jurisdiction of the Polda Metro Jaya and coordinating with the Propam Division and related agencies, will your answer remain like this?" asked Henry. "Not shown," replied Radite. "If you look at the answer?" Heny said. The judge immediately responded. In fact, witness Radite was questioned about the existence of the letter. "Have you ever been shown?" asked the judge. "No," said Radite. "If involved, will your opinion be different?" asked Ahmad Suhel again. "Different," replied Radite. Then, the judge immediately touched on Radite's inaccurate performance. This is because the warrant turned out to be owned by the defendants. "The problem is, when this brother was examined in the BAP, was this brother told or did you find out?" asked the judge. "We were given an explanation," replied Radite. "You're just being silent and don't see any connection with the explanation, or where did you investigate the explanation come from?" asked the judge again. "No (not investigating the investigator's explanation)" replied Radite. Radite Hermawa is one of six witnesses presented by the Public Prosecutor in obstructing the investigation into the premeditated murder case of Nopriansyah Yosua Hutabarat alias Brigadier J with the defendants Hendra Kurniawan and Agus Nurpatra. In this case, Hendra Kurniawan and Agus Nurpatra were jointly charged with securing evidence in the form of CCTV from the Police Complex security post, Duren Tiga, South Jakarta. Thus, they are suspected of violating Article 49 in conjunction with Article 33 of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions in conjunction with Article 55 Paragraph (1) of the 1st Criminal Code.