Andi Irfan Is Confused In The Pinangki Prosecutor's Session, Judge: In Front Of Us There Are Many Liars

Andi Irfan Jaya testifies for Prosecutor Pinangki Sirna Malasari (Photo: Antara)

JAKARTA - The panel of judges handling the case of Attorney Pinangki Sirna Malasari is furious with Andi Irfan Jaya's testimony. The judge assessed that Andi was convoluted in giving his testimony when he testified for Prosecutor Pinangki.

Chief Justice Ignasius Eko Purwanto reminded Andi Irfan Jaya to be honest in giving his testimony. Because, he is not a fool so he can be fooled.

"Logically, please, I remind the panel of judges that there are many people who are liars in front of us. The panel is free to interpret whether the witness is accepted or not, especially if you become a defendant in another case," said the head of the panel of judges, Ignasius Eko Purwanto, at the Criminal Court Corruption (Tipikor) Jakarta, reported by Antara, Monday, December 7.

In his testimony, Adi Irfan strongly denied the contents of the indictment of Attorney Pinangki Sirna Malasari who also mentioned his role in this case.

In the indictment, Pinangki and Andi Irfan Jaya submitted and explained the action plan that Joko Tjandra would submit to take care of Joko Tjandra's return by using the MA fatwa through the AGO on November 25, 2019 at The Exchange 106 Kuala Lumpur building.

The action plan consists of 10 stages of implementation and includes the initials "BR", namely Attorney General ST Burhanuddin and "HA" as the Chief Justice for the period March 2012-April 2020 Hatta Ali, including the price of "fees" that must be paid by Djoko Tjandra at each stage in total. value of 100 million US dollars but Djoko Tjandra only agreed to 10 million US dollars.

Andi Irfan is also named in the indictment of receiving US $ 500 thousand from Djoko Tjandra Herriyadi Angga Kusuma's (deceased) brother-in-law around the Senayan City mall.

Furthermore, Andi Irfan's name was used in the power of attorney for sale made by Anita Kolopaking which contained the sale of assets from Joko Tjandra to Andi Irfan Jaya as collateral if the US $ 10 million payment agreement and the down payment promised by Djoko Tjandra were not paid.

However Andi Irfan denied all the contents of the indictment. "Your answer is illogical and makes no sense. People are asked by KPT by a new person to meet on the trip but want to immediately send an ID card," said Judge Eko.

Andi Irfan replied. "Sorry, your honor, when I sent my KTP, I might be in the middle of an activity so I just sent it. I didn't have a bad prejudice but after I saw the inclusion of my name on the power of attorney, I contacted Mrs. Anita and Mr. Jochan," said Andi.

"What's in the interest of asking Anita to ask for an ID card?" asked Judge Eko.

"There was no prejudice but due to a causal letter so I conveyed my objection, but Mrs. Anita said that (the power of attorney) was from Pak Jochan," Andi Irfan replied.

Andi admitted that he then contacted Joko Tjandra regarding the power of attorney for sale.

"I called Mr. Jochan and said sorry what is this? I objected to the inclusion of my name but he (Djoko Tjandra) did not explain anything and was just angry so I immediately hung up the phone," said Andi Irfan.

"What is the purpose of being invited by Pinangki to Kuala Lumpur?" asked the judge.

"Just accompanying, playing," replied Andi Irfan.

"I hope you are honest," said Judge Eko.