Different Attitude! Brigadier J's Family Lawyers In Jambi Disagree With Kamaruddin Simanjuntak On Inspector General Ferdy Sambo's New Report

Brigadier J's family lawyer, Kamaruddin Simanjuntak/DOK PHOTO: Rizky Adytia-VOI

JAMBI - The lawyers for the family of the late Brigadier Nofriansyah Yosua Hutabarat or Brigadier J in Jambi, Ramos Hutabarat and Ferdy asked for the legal process to focus on the premeditated murder case. Lawyers in Jambi did not agree with Kamaruddin Simanjuntak, who handled the legal assistance for Brigadier J's case in Jakarta.

"The result of the meeting between the lawyer team from Jakarta and the family of the late Brigadier Nofriansyah Hutabarat (Brigadir J) who I accompanied earlier did not agree with the steps taken by the Jakarta attorney team who will make five new reports related to the Joshua case and we want the case of Article 340 of the Criminal Code to be revealed. first in court later," said Ramos Hutabarat in Jambi as reported by ANTARA, Thursday, August 18.

The lawyer for Brigadier J's family in Jambi did not agree with Kamaruddin Simanjuntak's plan to make a new report to the National Police Criminal Investigation Department. The new report regarding Inspector General Ferdy Sambo and Putri Candrawati is said to have biased the main handling of the case, namely the premeditated murder of Brigadier J.

Meanwhile, Brigadier J's attorneys in Jakarta, Kamaruddin Simanjuntak and Irma Hutabarat came to Jambi to collect or request the signature of a power of attorney to report Inspector General Ferdi Sambo and Putri Candrawatih in five new reports.

Among them made a false report by stating that the late Brigadier J had sexually harassed him and then said that the late Brigadier J had pointed a gun even though it was not true and the report was discontinued because no crime was found.

"So they have violated the market 317, 318 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 556," said Kamaruddin Simanjuntak when he arrived at Jambi's Sultan Thaha Airport.

The second power of attorney is intended for the theft because there was an activity of transferring funds from the account of the late Brigadier J to the account of suspect RR of Rp. 200 also on July 11, 2022 and then committing money laundering transactions.

The third power of attorney is related to an attempt to block the investigation or "obstraction of justice" which violates Article 221 of the Criminal Code jo 223 Juncto Article 88 concerning evil conspiracy.

Furthermore, the power of attorney regarding the spread of hoaxes or spreading false information regarding reports of sexual harassment is violating Article 14 paragraph 1 of Law Number 1 of 1946 concerning criminal law regulations, namely spreading false information and also slandering dead people, namely violating Article 321 of the Criminal Code.

Kamaruddin Simanjuntak also explained that the next power of attorney regarding the power of attorney for unlawful acts will be sued in a civil manner.