Simulation Of The Candidate Pair For The Charta Politica Survey: Highest Ganjar-Sandiaga, Lowest Prabowo-Cak Imin

Central Java Governor Ganjar Pranowo/DOK Public Relations Central Java Provincial Government via ANTARA

JAKARTA - The Charta Politica survey institute released the simulation results of the presidential candidate pairs (candidates) and vice presidential candidates (cawapres). From the 4 simulations of the names of the pairs that appeared, Ganjar Pranowo always excelled even if he was paired with anyone. In the survey, 4 simulations of the presidential and vice presidential candidates were taken from the 3 figures with the highest electability. The three figures are Ganjar Pranowo 31.2 percent, Prabowo Subianto 23.4 percent, and Anies Baswedan 20.0 percent. Simulation results 1, the Ganjar Pranowo-Ridwan Kamil pair won with 36.5 percent, the Anies Baswedan-AHY pair 28, 8 percent, and the Prabowo Subianto-Muhaimin Iskandar pair 24.8 percent. While not knowing 9.9 percent. "In simulation 2, it was almost balanced, Ganjar Pranowo-Sandiaga Uno 36.7 percent, then we tried to pair Anies Baswedan-Airlangga Hartarto 28.2 percent, and Prabowo Subianto-Puan Maharani 24.5 percent. Meanwhile, we don't know 10.6 percent ," said Executive Director of Charta Politica Yunarto Wijaya in an online release, Monday, June 13.

"So there is an interesting shift if we pair it like this," he added.

Then in simulation 3, Ganjar Pranowo-Erick Thohir was 35.3 percent. Anies Baswedan-Puan Maharani 25.3 percent, and Prabowo Subianto-Muhaimin Iskandar 23.7 percent and don't know 15.7 percent.

While in simulation 4, there are Ganjar Pranowo-Andika Perkasa 34.0 percent, Anies Baswedan-Khofifah Indar Parawansa 27.3 percent, Prabowo Subianto-Puan Maharani 24.7 percent, and don't know 14.0 percent.

Yunarto said, Ganjar excels in pairing with any candidate for vice president. The Ganjar factor is still the main booster, the deputy is secondary.

"Ganjar Pranowo excels in all pair simulations," said Yunarto.

The Charta Politica survey was conducted on 23 May-2 June 202 using the face-to-face interview method. Determination of the sample in the survey was carried out using a multistage random sampling method, on 1,200 respondents with a margin of error of 2.83 percent and quality control of 20 percent of the total sample.