Attorney Criticizes Heavy Articles That Ensnared Shane

JAKARTA - This was also responded to by Shane's attorney, Happy SP Sihombing criticized the article that ensnared his client, Shane in the criminal case of persecution by Mario Dandy Satrio against David Ozora, at Pesanggrahan, South Jakarta.

Shane became a suspect because he was at the scene of the persecution and was involved. So the police charged Shane with Article 355 of the Criminal Code. According to his attorney, Shane is considered not involved in planning the persecution.

In my opinion, Article 355 paragraph 2, we will criticize. We as the power (assess) Shane did not participate in planning, let alone carrying out the alleged abuse," Happy said when confirmed, Thursday, March 3.

He considered that Shane should be lighter than AG and Mario. Because, continued Happy, his client did not know the plan for the act of persecution.

When asked what article should have been applied to Shane, Happy admitted that he could not convey it because he was still studying it.

"Yes (still being studied-ed)," he concluded

Shane Lukas is suspected of having a heavier article, namely, Article 355 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with 56 of the Criminal Code, subsidiary 354 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code junto 56 of the Criminal Code, more than subsidiary 353 paragraph 2 in conjunction with 56 of the Criminal Code, more than subsidiary 351 paragraph 2 and or 76c junto 80 of the Child Protection Law.

Then AG, this 15-year-old woman was charged with Article 76c in conjunction with Article 80 of the Child Protection Law and/or 355 paragraph 1 in conjunction with 56, subsidiary 354 paragraph 1 in conjunction with 56 of the Criminal Code, more than subsidiary 353 paragraph 2 in conjunction with 56 of the Criminal Code, more than subsidiary 351 paragraph 2 in conjunction with 56 of the Criminal Code.

Meanwhile Mario is suspected of being under Article 355 of the Criminal Code paragraph 1 subsidiary Article 354 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code, which is more subsidiary to Article 353 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code, more than subsidiary to Article 352 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code. Then, Article 76c junto Article 80 of the Child Protection Law.