Psychologists Call Ferdy Sambo's Personal Smart But UnABLE To Play Emotions
JAKARTA - Psychologist and chairman of the Indonesian Forensic Psychology Association (Apsifor) Reni Kusumowardhani said the defendant Ferdy Sambo was intelligent. However, the former Head of Propam Division was not good at controlling emotions.This assessment was conveyed by Reni when presented as an expert in the trial of the alleged murder of Brigadier J for all defendants at the South Jakarta District Court, Wednesday, December 21."Pak Ferdy Sambo has intelligence above average. The abstraction capability of his imagination and creativity is very good, in general his way of thinking is more practical than theoretical," said Reni.In fact, Ferdy Sambo is said to be a hard worker. He is considered to always want to exceed the target given to him.In addition, he is also considered a good figure and obedient to norms. However, that does not mean that Ferdy Sambo cannot break the rules."Jdi does not mean that the person concerned is unable to violate norms and uses his intelligence to protect himself in a situation of urgency," said Reni.Apart from that, Reni said that based on the results of the examination using several methods, Ferdy Sambo was considered unable to control emotions properly.The former Head of Propam Division is considered to be a person who is quasi-emotional if he feels self-esteem or his self-esteem is being trampled on."So there is an easy self-esteem (or, red) that his self-esteem is disrupted if his honor is disturbed. And then he can become an emotional person who is not controlled, cannot think long about the actions taken," said Reni.For information, Ferdy Sambo is one of the defendants in the premeditated murder case of Brigadier J. He is said to have acted as the mastermind of the crime in the case.As for the other defendants, Putri Candrawathi, Strong Ma'ruf, Bripka Ricky Rizal, and Bharada Richard wary was charged with supporting and assisting the plan of the former Head of the Propam Division. Thus, they were charged with violating Article 340 of the Criminal Code, subsidiary to Article 338 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 to (1) of the Criminal Code.