JAKARTA - Artist Gisella Anastasia (Gisel) is officially named a suspect in the case of her nasty video. Gisel faces a maximum imprisonment of 12 years.
The hashtag #Gisel immediately occupied the trending topic of Warganet on Twitter. Not a few netizens also compared the case of Gisel's nasty video with Ariel NOAH in 2010.
Considering that Gisel was suspected by Article 4 paragraph 1 in conjunction with Article 29 and / or Article 8 in conjunction with Article 34 of Law Number 44 Year 2008 concerning Pornography. The same article was sentenced to prison for Nazriel Irham, the vocalist of the band Peterpan at that time.
Reflecting on the Ariel case, netizens considered that the determination of the suspect Gisel was incorrect. They asked the perpetrators of the video broadcaster who should have been named a suspect.
"Sorry, but not from the Gisel case, it's been from Ariel's case. It should have been the one who was caught spreading the video, the 'perpetrator' in the video doesn't know anything, they must have made it for personal consumption," commented the netizen, Tuesday, December 29th.
Many netizens also think that the case of Gisel and Ariel's nasty video is not that different. Where the cause is negligence to save personal files.
Hngg sometimes confused if there is a case of pornography like Gisel or Ariel in the past, why did you spread the jailed girl? And blame the one on the video? Isn't it privacy and what's wrong with it? And who in the video they consent to?
- bell (@sleepcraver) December 29, 2020
Despite reaping the pros and cons of netizens. Telematics expert Roy Suryo assessed that there was a difference in the case of the 18-second nasty video with the immoral scandal Nazriel Irham alias Ariel 'Peterpan'.
but having sex in a private place. the video also has its own. What's wrong is the one who spreads it. Just like the Ariel case, I wonder why Ariel was also jailed. Why is the country so fond of taking care of the groin of people who obviously like it.
- 배 리나 🌸 (@sbrnchrnns) December 29, 2020
"It's a little different, if it's true that Gisel's confession some time ago he deleted the photos and videos, of course this inaccuracy and carelessness could have entered the Pornography Law. Meanwhile, Ariel at that time deliberately saved the videos on the PC and then the sound engineer copied and distributed them, but it is true that Ariel was the one who recorded it, "he explained to VOI.
For that, Roy reminded the general public to be more careful in using gadgets and using them as well as possible.
"This case can be a valuable lesson for all of us to be careful in behaving, behaving and also acting on IT gadgets / devices, because the digital footprint will indeed be able to exist and even be exposed long after it occurs," he said.
The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)
