JAKARTA - The information report that became the basis for the investigation and determination of the suspect Lee Kah Hin as the Director of PT Wana Kencana Mineral is not known in the Book of Criminal Procedure or KUHAP.
This was conveyed by former Wakapolri Komjen (Ret.) Oegreseno when testifying at the South Jakarta District Court (PN) in a pretrial hearing filed by Lee Kah Hin. The company's boss sued the determination of suspects and detention in the case of providing false testimony under oath in the trial process by investigators from the Polda Metro Jaya.
"The report of the information is the domain of intelligence. Not the investigation," said Oegroseno, answering Lee Kah Hin's lawyer, Maqdir Ismail, at the South Jakarta District Court, Wednesday, March 11.
Oegroseno assessed that the report against Lee Kah Hin was not pure. "My analysis, there has been cooperation between the investigators and the reporting party. Actually this should not happen," he said.
"The report should be purely given by the reporter in the SPKT without being preceded by LI (Information Report)," he continued.
"This should not have happened because it is not regulated by the Criminal Code. "If this is the case, this is a private detective model. First, report it, then cooperate, then report to the police. This kind of conspiracy must be eliminated. Because legal certainty must be created," said Oegroseno.
Moreover, criminal investigations regulated in article 1, paragraph 4, 5 and 6 of the Criminal Procedure Code should be based on reports and complaints.
"Well, the Model A Police Report should be if you come to the crime scene (scene of the crime), Model B Report if the community experiences or becomes a victim. So there is no Information Report in the Criminal Procedure Code," he said.
Furthermore, Oegroseno also highlighted the trial process at the Central Jakarta District Court in October. He said that the process in the courtroom was the authority of the panel of judges.
"In the Criminal Procedure Code, the one who must remind the witness or anyone there (the courtroom) who is suspected of giving false testimony. Because it was originally sworn in," he said.
"If the judge finds that there is incorrect information in the courtroom, the judge will order the prosecutor to detain," said Oegroseno. "This is regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code."
In addition to Oegroseno, other experts present were Professor of Criminal Law from the University of Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Chairul Huda and Mahrus Ali from the Islamic University of Indonesia.
Then there are also two witnesses who saw the incident at the Central Jakarta District Court. They are Awwab Hafiz as the Head of Mine Technique of PT WKM and Eko Wiratmoko who is the President Director of PT WKM.
Lee Kah Hin is known to be a suspect in false testimony after testifying in a trial at the Central Jakarta District Court in October 2025. He then testified as a witness who was presented by the public prosecutor together with Eko Wiratmoko.
Lee Kah Hin's testimony has been included in the file by the police investigators. The trial tried the installation of a peg in the Izin Usaha Pertambangan area of PT WKM. The problem arose after PT Position reported Awwab and his colleague Marsel Bialembang to the police until they became defendants.
The cases of Awwab and Marsel were decided by the judge in December 2025. Meanwhile, the intelligence report was carried out a month before the judge decided the verdict or in November 2025.
Regarding the case that ensnared Lee Kah Hin, Haris Azhar as a lawyer previously suspected that there was a trade war between nickel companies in Weda Bay or Weda Bay, in East Halmahera, North Maluku. The suspicion arose because Ardiyanto represented PT Position when he reported to the Polda Metro Jaya.
"In our document, PT Position, its legitimacy is very low to control the land of PT WKM," Haris told reporters after the pretrial hearing.
This suspicion is getting stronger because there is a dialogue between PT WKM and PT Position, which is a subsidiary of PT Harum Energy, Tbk. This effort appears outside the legal process.
"The owner is Kiki Barki, his son Steven Barki. This Steven's name appears many times in the informal process outside the legal process," concluded Haris.
The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)
