JAKARTA - The trial of the Sritex credit case at the Semarang District Court (PN) on February 4, 2026, presented four internal witnesses of Bank DKI, namely EW (Solo Head), FSP (Head of Credit Administration Group or ADK), HH (ADK Manager), and AN (ADK Head).
The testimony of the witnesses revealed a number of facts related to the initiation process to the disbursement of credit.
Witness EW explained that the credit application started from the continuation of the KC Solo offer to the head office business group (KMN) after a field visit (OTS) in June-August 2020.
"There has never been any intervention or presence of the board of directors, including Babay Farid Wazdi (BFW), in this process," said witness EW in front of the panel of judges, in a release statement received by VOI, Tuesday, February 10, 2026.
He assessed that the proposed loan was worth continuing because PT Sritex's operations at that time were considered good, with 10,000-20,000 employees and a mask production project.
Three witnesses from the ADK group also revealed the lack of in-depth monitoring of invoice verification. They only did administrative checklists and never received call memos from KMN and RKT, so the alleged fake invoice escaped monitoring.
"We refer to the internal provisions of the credit administration, and do not know whether these provisions revoke the Guidelines for Medium Credit Companies or not," said FAP, a witness to the ADK section.
The trial also revealed that the disbursement of credit was carried out even though there were documents that had not been verified and without a report of obstacles to the credit committee. Witness FSP said the decision was influenced by targets in the business section as well as the RTGS time target.
"The Sritex credit approved by the A2 committee on Friday, October 23, 2020, was disbursed on Monday, October 26, 2020, even though there was no call memo of verification evidence by KMN," explained FSP.
Regarding the meeting's minutes, the FSP stated that the official credit documents were NK3 and SPPK, but according to him, other ADK officials, namely KI, said that the minutes had been distributed to KMN and RKT. The witnesses also confirmed that the entire credit withdrawal process was carried out in a documented internal mechanism.
"Not a single witness testified that the defendant (BFW) acted outside his authority or exceeded his duties," the trial revealed.
The facts of the trial are considered to show the importance of looking at the case based on the structure of the bank's internal authority and work mechanisms. The parties concerned stated that they would still respect the legal process and believe that the panel of judges would assess the case objectively and fairly.
The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)
