JAKARTA - The State Administrative Court (PTUN) held a follow-up hearing for residents of the Marinatama mango two shop house, Pademangan, North Jakarta on Monday, January 19, 2026.

Today's hearing is scheduled for a local examination (PS) attended by the chairman of the panel of judges, the interveners, the defendants and the interveners at the location of the Marinatama Mangga Dua shop, Pademangan.

The trial began at around 11.00 WIB, after it was previously scheduled at 09.00 WIB. The PS trial was chaired by the Head of the Panel of Judges Yuliant Prajaghupta, assisted by member judge Dwika Hendra Kurniawan with case number 236.

Meanwhile, the parties present from the plaintiff's side were residents of the MMD Pademangan shop owner and his lawyer, Subali.

Jumadi and Hendra Suryanto as lawyers for the intervener named Ratu Ivon were also present. Ratu Ivon is said to be the owner of the verponding eigendom of the object of the case.

Meanwhile, the intervener, Lieutenant Satu TNI AL Wahyu as the legal representative of the Ministry of Defense (Kemhan), was also present.

During the trial, Queen Ivon criticized the actions of the Head of the Navy (Inkopal) who was considered arbitrary in demolishing the shop owned by the MMD residents.

Even Queen Ivon said that the land belonged to her, while the building belonged to the residents who sued.

"This is indeed my land. But the shop and building belong to you because you feel you bought it," said Queen Ivon in front of MMD Pademangan residents, Monday, January 19, 2026.

Furthermore, Ratu said that the impact of the layoffs had an impact on the loss of jobs for workers. In fact, they should work to support their children and wives.

Ratu Ivon suggested that residents report the matter to Commission II of the DPR RI to convey their aspirations to the people's representatives.

"We have people's representatives, so don't be afraid to complain to Commission II of the DPR RI. Pity the workers, they don't work, even though their children and wives are waiting for needs," he said.

Meanwhile, according to Jumadi, the lawyer from Ratu Ivon stated that the issuance of the use rights certificate (SHP) NO 477 was considered defective in procedure. The reason is that the North Jakarta National Land Agency (BPN) has issued a certificate using No verponding eigendom no 6342 and 11110 located on Mangga Dua Street.

Meanwhile, Jumadi said, Eigendom No. 18728 belongs to his client, Queen Ivon, who has an address on Jalan Gunung Sahari, Pademangan, North Jakarta. And it is said that BPN North Jakarta, issued a certificate of wrong location, and was considered a wrong procedure.

"BPN North Jakarta issued SHP NO 477 on behalf of the Ministry of Defense, I assess the procedural defects. No eigendom verponding No 11110 and 6342 are located on Mangga Dua Street, well it is in the Penjaringan District area. Meanwhile, the eigendom verponding No 18728 belongs to our client whose address is on Jalan Gunung Sahari, Pademangan, North Jakarta," he said.

For this reason, continued Jumadi, his client felt disadvantaged because of the similarity in his client's data and the BPN Jakut data, according to the existing detailed map.

"In this case, our client feels disadvantaged, because the BPN issued SHP NO 477 in the name of the Ministry of Defense on our claim object. We have seen it together, our client's data based on the detailed map is correct," he said.

Besides that, the PTUN hearing with the PS agenda is also a special concern for a number of workers at the MMD shop.

The workers hope that they can resume their work if the shop has reopened.

Rini, one of the workers, said that he had not worked for more than a month due to the closure of the shop. Rini depends a lot on the shop for his livelihood.

"I hope that Inkopal as the manager will pay attention to the fate of workers, because here is the livelihood of the workers," said Rini.

As a result of the polemics and the commotion of the shop, he was unable to return to work.

"Until now, I have not received a salary from the company where I work. We also feel sorry for the employer," he said.

The residents, who continue to fight through a lawsuit to the Jakarta PTUN, hope that they can regain their rights to the land and buildings they have purchased.

It is just known that the lawsuit to the Jakarta PTUN began when 42 residents bought a shop house in 1997 with a Binding Sales and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) to PT Wisma Benhil (WB). However, as time went on, suddenly in 2001, BPN North Jakarta issued SHP Number 477.

The issuance of the SHP then made the residents of the shop owners worried. In fact, after the shop owner signed the PPJB, PT WB promised to issue a Building Use Right Certificate (SHGB). However, until now, the SHGB has not been issued. The shop is currently managed by Inkopal.

The lawyer for the MMD Pademangan residents, Subali, said that based on data from the Directorate General of State Assets (DJKN) of the Ministry of Finance, the rukan building on SHP 477 land has not been recorded as State Owned Building (BMN).

"The land on SHP 477 has not been recorded as BMN because there has been no handover from the residents," said Subali.


The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)