Sandra Dewi Withdraws Claim Of Objection To Confiscation Of Assets Related To Tin Cases

The trial read the conclusion of the lawsuit against the confiscation of assets related to the tin corruption case at the Central Jakarta District Court, Tuesday (28/10/2025). ANTARA/Agatha Olivia Victoria.

JAKARTA - Celebrities as well as the wife of the convict in the alleged corruption case of lead Harvey Moeis, Sandra Dewi, withdrew a lawsuit against confiscation of her assets related to the corruption case in the management of tin commodity trading in the mining permit area (IUP) of PT Timah in 2015-2022, which dragged her husband.

The revocation of the lawsuit was filed by Sandra through her attorney before the Panel of Judges read out the conclusions in a hearing at the Central Jakarta District Court, Tuesday, October 28.

"The Petitioners gave their power of attorney for the revocation letter dated October 28, 2025, which in essence is that the Petitioners are obedient and obedient to decisions that have permanent legal force," said Chief Judge Rios Rahmanto as quoted by Antara.

The Panel of Judges also determined, accepted, and granted the request for revocation, so that the trial of the objection submitted by Sandra Dewi, Kartika Dewi, and Raymond Gunawan automatically ended.

Some of the assets that Sandra objected to, namely a number of jewelry; two condominium units in Gading Serpong housing, Tangerang, Banten; houses in Pakubuwono housing, Kebayoran Baru, Jakarta; houses in Permata Regency, Jakarta; savings in blocked banks; as well as a number of bags.

The applicant in the trial objected to Case Number 7 / PID.SUS / OBJECT / TPK / 2025 / PN.Jkt.Pst is Sandra Dewi, Kartika Dewi, and Raymond Gunawan. Meanwhile, the respondent is in objection, namely the public prosecutor at the AGO.

As for Sandra Dewi's excuse in the objection, namely as a third party with good faith and assets obtained legally through endorsements or advertisements, personal purchases, gifts, not related to criminal acts of corruption, and there is an agreement to separate assets before marriage.

Previously, the Supreme Court decided to reject the appeal of the defendant Harvey Moeis, who was the extension of PT Refined Bangka Tin (RBT), so that he was still sentenced to 20 years in prison in a tin corruption case.

He is also still subject to fines and additional penalties in the form of replacement money such as the decision of the DKI Jakarta High Court, which is Rp. 1 billion, provided that if it is not paid, it will be replaced (subsider) with eight months in prison and compensation of Rp. 420 billion, subsidiary to 10 years in prison.

In this case, Harvey Moeis was found guilty of joint corruption related to the management of tin commodity trading in the mining business permit area or PT Timah Tbk IUP in 2015 '2022 which caused state losses of IDR 300 trillion.

Harvey was proven to have received Rp420 billion along with PT Quantum Skyline Exchange (QSE) Manager Helena Lim and committed money laundering (TPPU) from the money he received.

Thus, Harvey has violated Article 2 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 18 of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 and Article 3 of Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering jo. Article 55 paragraph (1) 1st of the Criminal Code.