JAKARTA - A number of residents who own the Marinatama Mangga Dua (MD) shophouse in Pademangan, North Jakarta and their attorneys returned to attend the hearing with the agenda of summoning a third party (intervention) at the Jakarta Administrative Court, Cakung, East Jakarta, Tuesday, August 12, 2025, afternoon. Today's trial, third parties again absent from the trial agenda.

"As a result of this trial, the Ministry of Defense did not come," said Wisnu, one of the residents to reporters.

However, the trial continues in one of the courtrooms of the Jakarta Administrative Court Office.

Meanwhile, 42 residents of the shop owner's attorney, Subali, said that the lawsuit submitted by his party to the Administrative Court had been declared perfect.

"As a result of the trial, the lawsuit letter has been declared perfect, and calls the Ministry of Defense (Kemhan) once again," he said.

According to Subali, today's trial material has gone to the stage of preparing for the completeness of the file. Then next week, the trial will continue with an answer agenda.

For your information, a number of residents of Marinatama Mangga Dua and their attorneys filed a lawsuit regarding the cancellation of Certificate of Use Rights (SHP) Number 477 at the Jakarta State Administrative Court (PTUN).

The lawsuit against the Jakarta Administrative Court began when the residents bought a shophouse in 1997 with the Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement (PPJB) to PT Wisma Benhil (WB).

However, in the midst of the time, suddenly in 2001 the North Jakarta National Land Agency (BPN) issued SHP Number 477.

This makes the residents of the shophouse owners worried. In fact, after the residents signed the PPJB, PT WB promised to issue a Certificate of Right to Build (SHGB).

However, until now what was promised to the shop owner was only decoration. It is proven that from 1997 until now the HGB certificate has not been issued.

Ruko is currently managed by cooperatives in one of the institutions. Not only that, residents are also required to pay an extension rental with an unreasonable price of up to Rp. 300 million per year, but to get a 50 percent discount, so to pay Rp. 150 million.

He considered that the issuance of the SHP was contrary to Government Regulation Number 8 of 1953 concerning Control of State Land. Even if it is issued by BPN, it is in the form of land management rights (HPL).

Wisnu admitted that his party was relieved because the lawsuit could continue to the next stage.

"That's our lawsuit that has been accepted. And for the legality of all kinds, it's okay, it's done," he concluded.

The Jakarta Administrative Court hearing today was chaired by Chief Judge Juliant Prajaghupa with members Dwika Hendra Kurniawan and Gugun Surya Gumilang with case number 236/G/2025 PTUN Jakarta.


The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)