JAKARTA - Actress Sandra Dewi admitted that she objected to the confiscation of dozens of luxury bags, such as the Louis Vuitton to Hermes brands, and jewelry carried out by the Indonesian Attorney General's Office (AGO) investigators.
This objection was conveyed when he was presented at the Corruption Court to testify at the trial of her husband's harvey moeis in the corruption case of tin management at the Central Jakarta Corruption Court.
Sandra Dewi argued that all the assets confiscated were not given by her husband but the result of her hard work as an artist.
Responding to this, legal practitioner Haposan Hutagalung said Sandra Dewi must be able to prove her statement.
If not, he said, it is reasonable to suspect that all of Sandra Dewi's assets are her husband's money laundering practices.
"If someone says that my assets are legal and legal. So he must be able to prove it. If the evidence exists, but it cannot be proven then it should be suspected as money laundering." Haposan hutagalung said when met at his office in East Jakarta.
SEE ALSO:
Haposan considers Sandra Dewi's testimony to violate the law and has the potential to become a suspect because it makes it difficult and uncooperative.
The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)