Before Commission III Of The DPR, Attorney General Burhanuddin: The Decision Of Attorney Pinangki Was Read Early In The Month

Attorney General ST Burhanuddin (Photo: Antara)

JAKARTA - Attorney General ST Burhanuddin said that the reading of the verdict against the defendant Attorney Pinangki Sirna Malasari will be read out on Monday, February 1. This was conveyed by him at the Working Meeting between the Attorney General's Office and Commission III of the DPR RI.

"The reading of the verdict (Attorney Pinangki, red) will be on Monday, February 1," said Burhanuddin during a work meeting broadcast on the DPR RI YouTube account, Tuesday, January 26.

This decision, he continued, was read out after the replication had been read out on Monday, January 25 and continued with a duplicate reading on Wednesday, January 27 tomorrow.

Previously reported, the public prosecutor (JPU) charged Attorney Pinangki Sirna Malasari with imprisonment for 4 years in prison and a fine of Rp. 500 million, a subsidiary of 6 months.

In this case, Pinangki was proven guilty and conclusively accepted gratification in the processing of a Supreme Court (MA) fatwa for Joko Tjandra. For that, the prosecutor asked the judge to find Pinangki guilty.

"(Demanding a panel of judges) Sentenced the defendant Dr. Pinangki Sirna Malasari to 4 years imprisonment, reduced while the defendant is in detention," the team of prosecutors told the Attorney General's Office when reading Pinangki's demands at the Corruption Court in Central Jakarta, Monday, 11 January.

In their demands, the prosecutor also considered things that were burdensome and burdensome for Pinangki. What is burdensome for Pinangki is considered not to support the government to eradicate corruption, collusion and nepotism.

Meanwhile, that made it easier for Pinangki to admit and regret his actions. Then, the prosecutor also considered Pinangki's child who was still 4 years old.

"Things that are mitigating, the defendant has never been convicted, the defendant regretted his actions and promised not to repeat, the defendant still has a 4 year old child."