AG Mario Dandy's Lover Was Not Presented At The Reconstruction Of The David Ozora Persecution Case

The location for the reconstruction of David's persecution by Mario Dandy at Green Permata Housing, Pesanggrahan, South Jakarta, Friday, March 10. (Rizky A- VOI)

JAKARTA - Polda Metro Jaya will not present the perpetrator of the child, AG, in the reconstruction of the case of persecution of David Ozora. The reason is that Mario Dandy's lover is still a minor.

"No, related to the juvenile justice system," said Head of Public Relations of Polda Metro Jaya Kombes Trunoyudo Wisnu Andiko when contacted, Friday, March 10.

So, later investigators will present a replacement role to play the role of AG in the persecution case.

Meanwhile, Mario and Shane Lukas as suspects will certainly be presented in person.

"Yes, related to the juvenile justice system. Investigators obey and comply with the juvenile justice system," said Trunoyudo.

The reconstruction of the persecution case against David Ozora is planned to be held around 14.00 WIB.

Later, all the suspects, namely Mario Dandy and Shane Lukas as well as the perpetrators of the child, AG, will be presented in person.

They will perform 23 scenes. It is possible from the beginning of planning to the act of persecution by Mario Dandy.

Director of General Criminal Investigation of Polda Metro Jaya Kombes Hengki Haryadi said the purpose of the reconstruction was to find agreement between the testimony of witnesses and perpetrators and the evidence that had been collected.

"We can see from the combination of several pieces of evidence of witness testimony from the suspect's statement, including the elements of the article that we have submitted," said Hengki.

For information, in this case, Mario Dandy, Shane Lukas, and AG were charged with different articles.

Mario Dandy is suspected of being under Article 355 of the Criminal Code paragraph 1 subsidiary Article 354 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code, which is more subsidiary to Article 353 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code, which is more subsidiary to Article 352 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code. Then, Article 76c junto Article 80 of the Child Protection Law.

Meanwhile, AG is charged with Article 76 c in conjunction with Article 80 of the Child Protection Law and or 355 paragraph 1 Jo 56 subsidiary 353 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code subsidiary 351 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code.