Adhi Makayasa's Winning Police Verdict In The Obstruction Of Justice Case Brigadier J Was Determined On February 24

Illustration of the judge's verdict in the trial. (Unsplash)

The panel of judges decided that the defendant Irfan Widyanto would undergo a verdict or verdict on the alleged obstruction of justice case on Friday, February 24. This is because the legal advisory team decided not to file a duplicate for the public prosecutor's replica (JPU).

"Furthermore, the agenda for the trial of the verdict is on Friday, February 24 yes. At the public prosecutor to appear the defendant at the trial that has been determined," said Chief Judge Afrizal Hadi during the trial, Monday, February 6.

The decision began when legal adviser Irfan Widyanto assessed that the prosecutor's replication only repeated the indictment file. So, it is deemed not necessary to respond.

"Thank you, Your Honor, we appreciate the replica after we listened together, there was nothing substantial about the content, only a repetition of the letter of demand, therefore we remain on the defense," said the legal adviser.

"So you didn't apply for a duplicate?" asked Judge Afrizal.

"Yes, we ask for the fairest decision," replied legal adviser Irfan Widyanto.

"Good, because there is no duplicate from the legal advisor, and the duplicate is verbally tried and remained in the original defense," said Judge Afrizal.

In the case of obstruction of justice in the death of Brigadier J, the defendant Irfan Widyanto is said to have played a role in taking CCTV DVR at the security post of the Police Complex, Duren Tiga, South Jakarta. This was done on orders from the defendant Agus Nurpatra.

Thus, his actions are believed to have violated Article 49 in conjunction with Article 33 of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) to 1 of the Criminal Code.