Prosecutors Who Did Not Mention The Motive For The Murder Of Brigadier J In Ferdy Sambo's Demand: Not Focus, Individual Nature

Ferdy Sambo / DOK ANTARA

JAKARTA - The public prosecutor (JPU) did not mention the motive in the spotlight and the questions behind the alleged murder case of Yosua alias Brigadier J. The reason is that it is individual and not specific.

"The motive is not to be focused because it is very individual and not specific," said the prosecutor at the trial at the South Jakarta District Court, Tuesday, January 17.

During reading the charges, the prosecutor only mentioned that there were two terrors that became the basis for the murder case, namely, planning and without planning.

For premeditated murder, it means that there is enough time for the perpetrator to think, react or not to do. In addition, the size of the timeframe is relative.

Meanwhile, the unplanned murder is defined as an immediate reaction from the perpetrator. Then, if using a tool, it must be those around it or without being prepared.

With the two terrorists, the prosecutor considered Ferdy Sambo's actions to fulfill the elements of premeditated murder. Because, he has time to think.

"The action of the defendant Ferdy Sambo, who still played badminton, has shown that there is a plan," he said.

The prosecutor's conclusion was also supported by the testimony of evidence and witnesses as well as experts during the evidentiary process in the trial.

"Based on the testimony of expert witnesses, letters and evidence presented at the trial, in our opinion, elements with the plan have been proven according to the law," said the prosecutor.

The prosecutor did not mention the motive and surprised Ferdy Sambo's camp. In fact, during the trial process, continued Rasamala, his party always emphasized the importance of the motive behind the termination of a criminal act.

"In fact, I think that's also a bit odd for us. Because at the trial we were told about the motive, but today the motive was suddenly not conveyed," he said.

"Does it mean that in such a thick indictment it contains inside but is not read out for avoiding public perceptions or what," he continued.

Ferdy Sambo is considered legally proven and convincingly committed the premeditated murder of Yosua alias Brigadier J. Thus, the prosecutor charged him with life imprisonment.

Behind the demands, there were several considerations from the prosecutor. However, there is not a single mitigating factor for Ferdy Sambo.

Meanwhile, for burdensome considerations, there are at least six points. First, Ferdy Sambo's actions resulted in the loss of Brigadier J's life and deep sorrow for his family.

Then, Ferdy Sambo was convoluted and did not admit his actions in providing information at trial. His absence caused unrest and chaos in the community.

Ferdy Sambo's actions are deemed inappropriate in his position as a law enforcement officer and high-ranking official at the National Police.

In this case, Ferdy Sambo is said to have planned the murder of Brigadier J. Planning was carried out on the third floor of Saguling's house, Duren Tiga, South Jakarta.

The shooting of Brigadier J was carried out in the living room of the official residence of the Police Complex, Duren Tiga, South Jakarta, on July 8.

The reason behind the shooting planning was because of the story about the harassment by Brigadier J against his wife, Putri Candrawathi.