The Defendant Irfan Widyanto Claims The First Police Who Dismantled The Obstruction Of Justice To The Police Leader

The defendant in the case obstructed the investigation or obstruction of justice of premeditated murder against Brigadier J), Irfan Widyanto/ANTARA

JAKARTA - The defendant Irfan Widyanto claimed to have uncovered an attempt to challenge the investigation or obstruction of justice in the case of the death of Brigadier J. In fact, he reported it to the police leadership. The defendant Irfan Widyanto made this statement while responding to Hendra Kurniawan's testimony. The claim began when Irfan agreed with the steps taken by the Deputy Chief of Police, Komjen Gatot Eddy Pramono, to gather all members of the police who knew about Ferdy Sambo's scenario. On that occasion, the defendant informed that if he was ordered to secure the CCTV DVR security post of the Police Complex, Duren Tiga, South Jakarta. " “ I would like to convey that the report to the leadership of the National Police is that I opened it for the first time," said Irfan during a trial at the South Jakarta District Court, Friday, December 16. In fact, even that step is considered to be able to help the process of investigating the case of Brigadier J's death. Because, three days earlier, a police report was reported regarding the alleged premeditated murder. "This means that 3 days after the LP, I have reported the actual facts with the assumption that with the facts we have reported to the leadership of the Police, it can help with the investigation carried out by the Criminal Investigation Unit against LP 340," said “The fact about this DVR, I gave a fact regarding this DVR. From the start, I took it by who, continued Irfan. On the other hand, Irfan said he did not have the ability to deny orders to secure CCTV by the defendant Agus Nurpatra. Because, he is only a junior in the Police agency. “ I would like to convey that against witness Karo Paminal's statement that I was powerless to resist or reject orders from Kaden A Paminal, which after I learned it was a tiered order, from Karo Paminal and Kadiv Propam, who were still active at that time,” he said “Considering that the order is in accordance with the applicable regulations in the Paminal jurisdiction. It was also added by me that I came there on direct orders from my Kanit. Where the order is an oral and written order. The order of writing means that it is the authority of my leadership, namely my Kanit. In other words, my responsibility to come to the TKP should be the responsibility of my leader, "” said Irfan. Irfan Widyanto was charged with combining and copying CCTV DVR at the security post of the Police Complex, Duren Tiga, South Jakarta. Thus, it is suspected of violating Article 49 in conjunction with Article 33 subsidiary Article 48 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 32 paragraph (1) of the ITE Law Number 19 of 2016 and/or the second indictment of Article 233 of the Criminal Code subsidiary Article 221 paragraph (1) to 2 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 to (1) of the Criminal Code.